EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

New York Times vs Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how New York Times (NYT) and Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp (601928) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp as the more attractively valued of the two: New York Times trades at $64.77 versus a fair value of $41.95 (-35%), while Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp trades at ¥9.39 versus ¥11.50 (+22%).
New York Times
NYT · USD · Communication Services
-35%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$64.77
Fair Value$41.95
Quality70/100
Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp
601928.SHG · CNY · Communication Services
+22%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price¥9.39
Fair Value¥11.50
Quality60/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

New York TimesJiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp
Valuation
32.3×P/E (TTM)13.7×
4.24×P/S (TTM)1.97×
5.96×P/B1.19×
22.3×EV/EBITDA15.3×
3.79×PEG
1.1%Dividend yield5.4%
$0.77Dividend per share¥0.50
Profitability
13%Net margin14%
13%Operating margin11%
20%Return on equity8%
10%Return on assets2%
Growth
12%Revenue growth (YoY)-11%
7.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.2%
9.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)0.3%
Balance & size
$12BMarket cap$4B
healthyGrowth qualityweak

Even match: 6 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

New York Timesof which business quality 77 · market factors 50 Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corpof which business quality 63 · market factors 46
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
69
40
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
60
45
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
83
53
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
85
80
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
76
90
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
62
97
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
42
29
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
51
18
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
87
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

New York Times

DCF Models$44.27
Earnings-Based$25.06
Dividend Discount$8.21
Multiples$40.34
Asset-Based$8.49
Growth DCF$45.30
Economic Profit$22.32
Growth Earnings$32.37

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp

DCF Models¥10.16
Earnings-Based¥4.77
Dividend Discount¥8.98
Multiples¥11.99
Asset-Based¥5.25
Growth DCF¥8.75
Economic Profit¥6.08
Growth Earnings¥11.42

12 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

New York Times
Bear $31.78Fair Value $41.95Bull $52.11
$64.77 = current price (white tick)
Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp
Bear ¥7.00Fair Value ¥11.50Bull ¥14.99
¥9.39 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

New York Times · Communication Services

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-35% · below median

Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp · Communication Services

Quality score60 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+22% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp as the more attractively valued of the two: New York Times trades at $64.77 versus a fair value of $41.95 (-35%), while Jiangsu Phoenix Publishing & Media Corp trades at ¥9.39 versus ¥11.50 (+22%).

New York Times has the higher quality score (70/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.