EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

New Zealand Energy vs Cnooc: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how New Zealand Energy (NZ) and Cnooc (0883) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cnooc as the more attractively valued of the two: New Zealand Energy trades at C$0.47 versus a fair value of C$0.04 (-91%), while Cnooc trades at HK$23.40 versus HK$26.35 (+13%).
New Zealand Energy
NZ.V · CAD · Energy
-91%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceC$0.47
Fair ValueC$0.04
Quality19/100
Cnooc
0883.HK · HKD · Energy
+13%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$23.40
Fair ValueHK$26.35
Quality63/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

New Zealand EnergyCnooc
Valuation
P/E (TTM)7.7×
14.61×P/S (TTM)2.67×
4.31×P/B1.35×
EV/EBITDA4.3×
PEG0.16×
Dividend yield5.0%
Dividend per shareHK$1.15
Profitability
0%Net margin31%
Operating margin45%
-120%Return on equity15%
-29%Return on assets9%
Growth
51%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
-38.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.7%
-34.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.0%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.07×
$18MMarket cap$139B
weakGrowth qualityexpensive

Cnooc leads: 1 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

New Zealand Energyof which business quality 19 · market factors 59 Cnoocof which business quality 64 · market factors 58
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
0
55
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
24
36
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
76
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
29
84
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
25
40
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
0
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
86
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
80
58
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
50
79

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

New Zealand Energy

Asset-BasedC$0.05

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Cnooc

DCF ModelsHK$41.36
Earnings-BasedHK$27.87
Dividend DiscountHK$25.25
MultiplesHK$33.44
Asset-BasedHK$12.08
Growth DCFHK$33.29
Economic ProfitHK$32.53
Growth EarningsHK$33.61

8 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

New Zealand Energy
Bear C$0.03Fair Value C$0.04Bull C$0.06
C$0.47 = current price (white tick)
Cnooc
Bear HK$19.80Fair Value HK$26.35Bull HK$33.85
HK$23.40 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

New Zealand Energy · Energy

Quality score19 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-91% · bottom 25%

Cnooc · Energy

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+13% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cnooc as the more attractively valued of the two: New Zealand Energy trades at C$0.47 versus a fair value of C$0.04 (-91%), while Cnooc trades at HK$23.40 versus HK$26.35 (+13%).

Cnooc has the higher quality score (63/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.