EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Oasis Crescent Property Fund vs Goodman: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Oasis Crescent Property Fund (OAS) and Goodman (GMG) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Oasis Crescent Property Fund as the less overvalued of the two: Oasis Crescent Property Fund trades at ZAR 29.35 versus a fair value of ZAR 20.60 (-30%), while Goodman trades at A$29.95 versus A$7.37 (-75%).
Oasis Crescent Property Fund
OAS.JSE · ZAR · Real Estate
-30%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceZAR 29.35
Fair ValueZAR 20.60
Quality55/100
Goodman
GMG.AU · AUD · Real Estate
-75%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$29.95
Fair ValueA$7.37
Quality61/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Oasis Crescent Property FundGoodman
Valuation
15.3×P/E (TTM)35.5×
12.81×P/S (TTM)13.96×
1.03×P/B1.86×
24.3×EV/EBITDA24.5×
PEG2.72×
0.0%Dividend yield1.0%
ZAR 1.21Dividend per shareA$0.30
Profitability
82%Net margin55%
53%Operating margin56%
7%Return on equity8%
3%Return on assets4%
Growth
2%Revenue growth (YoY)-16%
11.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.4%
7.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.1%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.20×
$119MMarket cap$43B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Oasis Crescent Property Fund leads: 7 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Oasis Crescent Property Fundof which business quality 53 · market factors 79 Goodmanof which business quality 61 · market factors 43
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
38
38
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
30
62
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
40
76
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
75
74
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
63
57
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
96
36
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
84
32
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
74
55

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Oasis Crescent Property Fund

DCF ModelsZAR 11.64
Dividend DiscountZAR 4.44
MultiplesZAR 20.60
Asset-BasedZAR 19.04
Growth DCFZAR 8.17
Economic ProfitZAR 21.64

15 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Goodman

DCF ModelsA$7.40
Dividend DiscountA$4.92
MultiplesA$6.55
Asset-BasedA$7.64
Growth DCFA$8.19
Economic ProfitA$9.80

16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Oasis Crescent Property Fund
Bear ZAR 15.47Fair Value ZAR 20.60Bull ZAR 23.53
ZAR 29.35 = current price (white tick)
Goodman
Bear A$4.54Fair Value A$7.37Bull A$10.49
A$29.95 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Oasis Crescent Property Fund · Real Estate

Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside-30% · below median

Goodman · Real Estate

Quality score61 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-75% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Oasis Crescent Property Fund as the less overvalued of the two: Oasis Crescent Property Fund trades at ZAR 29.35 versus a fair value of ZAR 20.60 (-30%), while Goodman trades at A$29.95 versus A$7.37 (-75%).

Goodman has the higher quality score (61/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.