EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

POLA Orbis Holdings vs Procter & Gamble: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how POLA Orbis Holdings (PORBF) and Procter & Gamble (PG) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: POLA Orbis Holdings trades at $7.70 versus a fair value of $5.58 (-28%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $146 versus $108 (-26%).
POLA Orbis Holdings
PORBF · USD · Consumer Staples
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$7.70
Fair Value$5.58
Quality71/100
Procter & Gamble
PG · USD · Consumer Staples
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$146
Fair Value$108
Quality75/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

POLA Orbis HoldingsProcter & Gamble
Valuation
28.5×P/E (TTM)21.5×
P/S (TTM)3.95×
P/B6.58×
EV/EBITDA14.3×
PEG4.13×
4.4%Dividend yield2.9%
$52.00Dividend per share$4.23
Profitability
6%Net margin19%
12%Operating margin23%
7%Return on equity31%
5%Return on assets11%
Growth
-1%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
0.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)1.7%
-0.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.5%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.48×
$2BMarket cap$342B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Procter & Gamble leads: 1 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

POLA Orbis Holdingsof which business quality 71 · market factors 40 Procter & Gambleof which business quality 71 · market factors 54
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
53
73
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
38
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
67
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
91
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
85
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
99
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
22
40
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
4
33
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
91

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

POLA Orbis Holdings

DCF Models$6.50
Earnings-Based$3.46
Multiples$6.49
Asset-Based$3.06
Growth DCF$6.62
Economic Profit$4.05
Growth Earnings$4.22

19 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

Procter & Gamble

DCF Models$97.73
Earnings-Based$85.21
Dividend Discount$59.55
Multiples$120
Asset-Based$14.97
Growth DCF$74.21
Economic Profit$68.20
Growth Earnings$112

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

POLA Orbis Holdings
Bear $4.18Fair Value $5.58Bull $6.97
$7.70 = current price (white tick)
Procter & Gamble
Bear $70.77Fair Value $108Bull $151
$146 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

POLA Orbis Holdings · Consumer Staples

Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-28% · below median

Procter & Gamble · Consumer Staples

Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-26% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Procter & Gamble as the less overvalued of the two: POLA Orbis Holdings trades at $7.70 versus a fair value of $5.58 (-28%), while Procter & Gamble trades at $146 versus $108 (-26%).

Procter & Gamble has the higher quality score (75/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.