EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Ruby Mills vs Shenzhou International Group Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Ruby Mills (RUBYMILLS) and Shenzhou International Group Holdings (2313) compare, as of Aug 18, 2026.

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Ruby Mills trades at ₹382 versus a fair value of ₹166 (-57%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$41.42 versus HK$68.24 (+65%).
Ruby Mills
RUBYMILLS.NSE · INR · Consumer Discretionary
-57%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹382
Fair Value₹166
Quality48/100
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
2313.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+65%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$41.42
Fair ValueHK$68.24
Quality62/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Ruby MillsShenzhou International Group Holdings
Valuation
29.4×P/E (TTM)9.9×
3.05×P/S (TTM)2.15×
1.62×P/B1.78×
18.8×EV/EBITDA7.2×
—PEG0.88×
0.8%Dividend yield5.2%
₹2.50Dividend per shareHK$2.34
Profitability
12%Net margin19%
16%Operating margin18%
7%Return on equity16%
3%Return on assets7%
Growth
54%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
11.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.7%
23.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.1%
Balance & size
0.49×Debt / equity0.01×
$115MMarket cap$9B
expensiveGrowth qualitymixed

Shenzhou International Group Holdings leads: 4 to 9 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Ruby Millsof which business quality 47 · market factors 89 Shenzhou International Group Holdingsof which business quality 61 · market factors 27
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
33
53
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
49
33
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
32
42
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
57
94
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
42
60
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
62
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
18
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
100
9
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
82

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Ruby Mills

Earnings-Based₹103
Dividend Discount₹30.74
Multiples₹177
Asset-Based₹135
Economic Profit₹104
Growth Earnings₹263

16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Shenzhou International Group Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$70.68
Earnings-BasedHK$45.41
Dividend DiscountHK$43.01
MultiplesHK$67.20
Asset-BasedHK$16.72
Growth DCFHK$46.79
Economic ProfitHK$44.98
Growth EarningsHK$73.43

5 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Ruby Mills
Bear ₹97.17Fair Value ₹166Bull ₹234
₹382 = current price (white tick)
Shenzhou International Group Holdings
Bear HK$45.16Fair Value HK$68.24Bull HK$85.21
HK$41.42 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Ruby Mills · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside-57% · bottom 25%

Shenzhou International Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score62 · above median
Fair value upside+65% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 18, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Shenzhou International Group Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Ruby Mills trades at ₹382 versus a fair value of ₹166 (-57%), while Shenzhou International Group Holdings trades at HK$41.42 versus HK$68.24 (+65%).

Shenzhou International Group Holdings has the higher quality score (62/100).

See the full analysis →
Ruby Mills · Shenzhou International Group Holdings

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Ruby Mills

Amazon.com vs Toyota Motor CorporationAmazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupTesla vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Shenzhou International Group Holdings

Tesla vs PDD HoldingsTesla vs Sony GroupHome Depot vs Toyota Motor CorporationHome Depot vs PDD Holdings
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.