EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Razor Labs vs Microsoft: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Razor Labs (RZR) and Microsoft (MSFT) compare, as of Aug 27, 2026.

As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: Razor Labs trades at ILS 5.29 versus a fair value of ILS 2.19 (-59%), while Microsoft trades at $496 versus $381 (-23%).
Razor Labs
RZR.TA · ILS · Information Technology
-59%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceILS 5.29
Fair ValueILS 2.19
Quality49/100
Microsoft
MSFT · USD · Information Technology
-23%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$496
Fair Value$381
Quality66/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Razor LabsMicrosoft
Valuation
P/E (TTM)22.9×
1.89×P/S (TTM)8.99×
P/B8.33×
EV/EBITDA15.6×
PEG1.19×
Dividend yield0.7%
Dividend per share$3.56
Profitability
-49%Net margin39%
-37%Operating margin46%
-413%Return on equity34%
-14%Return on assets15%
Growth
55%Revenue growth (YoY)18%
88.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)12.4%
9.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)14.5%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.12×
$65MMarket cap$2.9T
expensiveGrowth qualityexpensive

Microsoft leads: 3 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Razor Labsof which business quality 47 · market factors 38 Microsoftof which business quality 65 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
22
75
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
60
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
11
71
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
50
79
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
1
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
22
57
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
40
49
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
52
53
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
77
84

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

No model data.

Microsoft

DCF Models$333
Earnings-Based$189
Dividend Discount$61.93
Multiples$308
Asset-Based$30.98
Growth DCF$249
Economic Profit$184
Growth Earnings$332

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Razor Labs
Bear ILS 1.65Fair Value ILS 2.19Bull ILS 2.74
ILS 5.29 = current price (white tick)
Microsoft
Bear $192Fair Value $381Bull $480
$496 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Razor Labs · Information Technology

Quality score49 · below median
Fair value upside-59% · below median

Microsoft · Information Technology

Quality score66 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-23% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 27, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Microsoft as the less overvalued of the two: Razor Labs trades at ILS 5.29 versus a fair value of ILS 2.19 (-59%), while Microsoft trades at $496 versus $381 (-23%).

Microsoft has the higher quality score (66/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.