Siljansvik AB (publ) vs Nextera Energy: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Siljansvik AB (publ) (SIVI) and Nextera Energy (NEE) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Siljansvik AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Siljansvik AB (publ) trades at SEK 116 versus a fair value of SEK 82.78 (-29%), while Nextera Energy trades at $84.65 versus $32.94 (-61%).
Siljansvik AB (publ)
SIVI.ST · SEK · Information Technology
-29%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 116
Fair ValueSEK 82.78
Quality40/100
Nextera Energy
NEE · USD · Utilities
-61%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$84.65
Fair Value$32.94
Quality46/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Siljansvik AB (publ)Nextera Energy
Valuation
21.5×P/E (TTM)22.6×
25.77×P/S (TTM)6.69×
0.77×P/B3.41×
—EV/EBITDA19.3×
—PEG1.95×
2.2%Dividend yield2.6%
SEK 2.52Dividend per share$2.32
Profitability
103%Net margin29%
6%Operating margin30%
3%Return on equity10%
-1%Return on assets2%
Growth
400%Revenue growth (YoY)7%
-49.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)9.4%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.8%
Balance & size
0.01×Debt / equity1.64×
$167MMarket cap$186B
weakGrowth qualityexpensive
Nextera Energy leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Siljansvik AB (publ)of which business quality 42 · market factors 74Nextera Energyof which business quality 44 · market factors 60
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
32
40
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
1
59
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
12
30
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
87
86
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
68
44
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
70
58
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
100
65
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Siljansvik AB (publ)
DCF ModelsSEK 106
Earnings-BasedSEK 40.47
Dividend DiscountSEK 36.51
MultiplesSEK 82.78
Asset-BasedSEK 99.94
Economic ProfitSEK 101
Growth EarningsSEK 73.82
10 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.
Nextera Energy
DCF Models$9.40
Earnings-Based$16.48
Dividend Discount$37.40
Multiples$32.94
Asset-Based$17.54
Economic Profit$28.99
Growth Earnings$50.39
17 of 17 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Siljansvik AB (publ)
Bear SEK 62.09Fair Value SEK 82.78Bull SEK 86.75
SEK 116 = current price (white tick)
Nextera Energy
Bear $24.70Fair Value $32.94Bull $46.73
$84.65 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Siljansvik AB (publ) · Information Technology
Quality score40 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-29% · above median
Nextera Energy · Utilities
Quality score46 · above median
Fair value upside-61% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Siljansvik AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Siljansvik AB (publ) trades at SEK 116 versus a fair value of SEK 82.78 (-29%), while Nextera Energy trades at $84.65 versus $32.94 (-61%).
Nextera Energy has the higher quality score (46/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
