EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Schlumberger vs Tidewater: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Schlumberger (SLB) and Tidewater (TDGMW) compare, as of Sep 6, 2026.

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Tidewater as the less overvalued of the two: Schlumberger trades at $57.51 versus a fair value of $28.66 (-50%), while Tidewater trades at $98.80 versus $70.79 (-28%).
Schlumberger
SLB · USD · Energy
-50%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$57.51
Fair Value$28.66
Quality52/100
Tidewater
TDGMW · USD · Energy
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$98.80
Fair Value$70.79
Quality64/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

SchlumbergerTidewater
Valuation
20.7×P/E (TTM)—
1.96×P/S (TTM)0.28×
2.69×P/B0.27×
10.3×EV/EBITDA1.1×
1.62×PEG—
−50.2%Fair value upside−28.4%
2.0%Dividend yield9.4%
$1.15Dividend per share—
Profitability
12%Operating margin-9%
14%Return on equity24%
6%Return on assets7%
Growth
3%Revenue growth (YoY)-43%
8.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)27.8%
8.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)27.8%
+15.9%Value creation/yr+17.0%
Balance & size
9.8×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)4.4×
0.37×Debt / equity0.48×
$70BMarket cap$375M
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Tidewater leads: 3 to 10 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Schlumbergerof which business quality 54 · market factors 77 Tidewaterof which business quality 64 · market factors 77
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
67
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
18
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
72
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
67
57
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
58
39
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
68
50
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
71
83
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
98
100
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
58
69

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familySchlumbergerPrice $57.51TidewaterPrice $98.80
DCF Models-37%below the price$35.98+1695%above the price$1,773
Earnings-Based-62%below the price$21.58+2363%above the price$2,433
Dividend Discount-68%below the price$18.13+26%above the price$125
Multiples-48%below the price$30.02+572%above the price$663
Asset-Based-80%below the price$11.70+144%above the price$241
Growth DCF-29%below the price$40.81+1416%above the price$1,497
Economic Profit-53%below the price$27.29+751%above the price$840
Growth Earnings-50%below the price$28.48+2597%above the price$2,664
Minimum-80%below the price$11.70+26%above the price$125
Maximum-29%below the price$40.81+2597%above the price$2,664
Median-52%below the price$27.88+1083%above the price$1,169
Geometric mean-56%below the price$25.08+767%above the price$856

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Schlumberger: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Tidewater: 0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Schlumberger
Bear $21.17Fair Value $28.66Bull $36.48
$57.51 = current price (white tick)
Tidewater
Bear $52.83Fair Value $70.79Bull $203
$98.80 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Schlumberger · Energy

Quality score52 · above median
Fair value upside-50% · below median

Tidewater · Energy

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-28% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Tidewater as the less overvalued of the two: Schlumberger trades at $57.51 versus a fair value of $28.66 (-50%), while Tidewater trades at $98.80 versus $70.79 (-28%).

Tidewater has the higher quality score (64/100).

See the full analysis →
Schlumberger · Tidewater

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Schlumberger

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs PDD Holdings

Related to Tidewater

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&tMeta Platforms vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.