EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Target Hospitality vs Cintas: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Target Hospitality (TH) and Cintas (CTAS) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cintas as the less overvalued of the two: Target Hospitality trades at $16.51 versus a fair value of $2.89 (-82%), while Cintas trades at $203 versus $95.30 (-53%).
Target Hospitality
TH · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-82%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$16.51
Fair Value$2.89
Quality38/100
Cintas
CTAS · USD · Industrials
-53%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$203
Fair Value$95.30
Quality78/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Target HospitalityCintas
Valuation
P/E (TTM)42.0×
6.32×P/S (TTM)7.33×
5.25×P/B16.06×
70.9×EV/EBITDA27.0×
1.34×PEG3.06×
Dividend per share$1.74
Profitability
-13%Net margin18%
-20%Operating margin24%
-11%Return on equity41%
-5%Return on assets16%
Growth
4%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
-13.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)8.5%
7.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.6%
Balance & size
0.46×Debt / equity0.47×
$2BMarket cap$83B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Cintas leads: 4 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Target Hospitalityof which business quality 41 · market factors 65 Cintasof which business quality 74 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
9
91
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
17
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
35
67
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
65
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
71
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
12
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
89
44
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
86
45
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
92
90

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Target Hospitality

DCF Models$2.54
Dividend Discount$0.02
Multiples$3.73
Asset-Based$2.62

6 of 6 models see the stock below the current price.

Cintas

DCF Models$96.89
Earnings-Based$48.67
Dividend Discount$30.85
Multiples$76.91
Asset-Based$8.61
Growth DCF$74.33
Economic Profit$58.94
Growth Earnings$81.35

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Target Hospitality
Bear $1.95Fair Value $2.89Bull $5.39
$16.51 = current price (white tick)
Cintas
Bear $56.44Fair Value $95.30Bull $121
$203 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Target Hospitality · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score38 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-82% · bottom 25%

Cintas · Industrials

Quality score78 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-53% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cintas as the less overvalued of the two: Target Hospitality trades at $16.51 versus a fair value of $2.89 (-82%), while Cintas trades at $203 versus $95.30 (-53%).

Cintas has the higher quality score (78/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.