STOCK COMPARISON
US Foods Holding vs Sysco: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how US Foods Holding (USFD) and Sysco (SYY) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sysco as the less overvalued of the two: US Foods Holding trades at $107 versus a fair value of $55.10 (-48%), while Sysco trades at $84.35 versus $60.58 (-28%).
US Foods Holding
USFD · USD · Consumer Staples
-48%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$107
Fair Value$55.10
Quality66/100
Sysco
SYY · USD · Consumer Staples
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$84.35
Fair Value$60.58
Quality60/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
US Foods HoldingSysco
Valuation
33.4×P/E (TTM)22.4×
0.55×P/S (TTM)0.47×
5.07×P/B21.49×
15.7×EV/EBITDA11.1×
0.24×PEG1.59×
—Dividend yield2.7%
—Dividend per share$2.16
Profitability
2%Net margin2%
2%Operating margin4%
15%Return on equity82%
6%Return on assets8%
Growth
3%Revenue growth (YoY)5%
5.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.8%
11.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.0%
Balance & size
1.18×Debt / equity6.75×
$22BMarket cap$39B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Sysco leads: 4 to 9 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
US Foods Holdingof which business quality 61 · market factors 73
Syscoof which business quality 56 · market factors 62
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
62
74
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
51
33
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
52
41
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
41
29
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
95
73
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
73
80
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
68
52
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
83
58
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
89
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
US Foods Holding
DCF Models$49.92
Earnings-Based$22.83
Multiples$56.79
Asset-Based$13.10
Growth DCF$51.51
Economic Profit$29.44
Growth Earnings$53.12
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Sysco
DCF Models$53.13
Earnings-Based$29.47
Dividend Discount$35.72
Multiples$70.73
Asset-Based$2.56
Growth DCF$50.15
Economic Profit$34.06
Growth Earnings$67.69
23 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
US Foods Holding
Bear $26.39Fair Value $55.10Bull $80.58
$107 = current price (white tick)
Sysco
Bear $27.54Fair Value $60.58Bull $99.12
$84.35 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
US Foods Holding · Consumer Staples
Quality score66 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-48% · bottom 25%
Sysco · Consumer Staples
Quality score60 · above median
Fair value upside-28% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Sysco as the less overvalued of the two: US Foods Holding trades at $107 versus a fair value of $55.10 (-48%), while Sysco trades at $84.35 versus $60.58 (-28%).
US Foods Holding has the higher quality score (66/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
