STOCK COMPARISON
Vossloh vs Union Pacific: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Vossloh (VOS) and Union Pacific (UNP) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Vossloh as the less overvalued of the two: Vossloh trades at €57.80 versus a fair value of €35.76 (-38%), while Union Pacific trades at $293 versus $145 (-51%).
Vossloh
VOS.XETRA · EUR · Industrials
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€57.80
Fair Value€35.76
Quality37/100
Union Pacific
UNP · USD · Industrials
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$293
Fair Value$145
Quality67/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
VosslohUnion Pacific
Valuation
26.6×P/E (TTM)24.6×
1.01×P/S (TTM)7.25×
2.32×P/B9.70×
11.8×EV/EBITDA16.5×
1.98×PEG3.64×
1.7%Dividend yield1.8%
€1.15Dividend per share$5.48
Profitability
4%Net margin29%
0%Operating margin40%
8%Return on equity41%
3%Return on assets9%
Growth
25%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
8.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-0.5%
9.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.6%
Balance & size
0.80×Debt / equity1.64×
$1BMarket cap$179B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Vossloh leads: 8 to 6 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Vosslohof which business quality 38 · market factors 21
Union Pacificof which business quality 63 · market factors 72
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
36
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
25
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
52
71
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
31
40
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
65
47
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
52
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
12
66
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
81
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
25
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Vossloh
DCF Models€35.71
Earnings-Based€32.24
Dividend Discount€10.89
Multiples€61.66
Asset-Based€21.20
Growth DCF€30.86
Economic Profit€25.53
Growth Earnings€56.49
18 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Union Pacific
DCF Models$122
Earnings-Based$97.30
Multiples$180
Asset-Based$20.84
Growth DCF$69.97
Economic Profit$121
Growth Earnings$204
23 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Vossloh
Bear €26.77Fair Value €35.76Bull €59.42
€57.80 = current price (white tick)
Union Pacific
Bear $89.73Fair Value $145Bull $266
$293 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Vossloh · Industrials
Quality score37 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-38% · below median
Union Pacific · Industrials
Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-51% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Vossloh as the less overvalued of the two: Vossloh trades at €57.80 versus a fair value of €35.76 (-38%), while Union Pacific trades at $293 versus $145 (-51%).
Union Pacific has the higher quality score (67/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
