EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Vivid Games S.A vs NetEase: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Vivid Games S.A (VVD) and NetEase (NTES) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Vivid Games S.A trades at PLN 0.58 versus a fair value of PLN 0.08 (-87%), while NetEase trades at $130 versus $171 (+31%).
Vivid Games S.A
VVD.WAR · PLN · Communication Services
-87%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PricePLN 0.58
Fair ValuePLN 0.08
Quality23/100
NetEase
NTES · USD · Communication Services
+31%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$130
Fair Value$171
Quality73/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Vivid Games S.ANetEase
Valuation
P/E (TTM)16.1×
0.56×P/S (TTM)4.76×
1.77×P/B3.39×
EV/EBITDA12.3×
PEG1.33×
Dividend yield2.4%
Dividend per share$4.18
Profitability
-36%Net margin30%
-7%Operating margin41%
-80%Return on equity22%
-6%Return on assets11%
Growth
-13%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-37.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.3%
-19.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.9%
Balance & size
1.91×Debt / equity0.00×
$8MMarket cap$81B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

NetEase leads: 2 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Vivid Games S.Aof which business quality 23 · market factors 35 NetEaseof which business quality 79 · market factors 52
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
26
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
20
53
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
9
91
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
28
95
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
67
63
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
32
46
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
23
43
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Vivid Games S.A

Dividend DiscountPLN 0.34
MultiplesPLN 0.09
Asset-BasedPLN 0.06

4 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

NetEase

DCF Models$396
Earnings-Based$260
Dividend Discount$74.24
Multiples$161
Asset-Based$33.72
Growth DCF$344
Economic Profit$138
Growth Earnings$329

7 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Vivid Games S.A
Bear PLN 0.08Fair Value PLN 0.08Bull PLN 0.09
PLN 0.58 = current price (white tick)
NetEase
Bear $128Fair Value $171Bull $295
$130 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Vivid Games S.A · Communication Services

Quality score23 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-87% · bottom 25%

NetEase · Communication Services

Quality score73 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+31% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees NetEase as the more attractively valued of the two: Vivid Games S.A trades at PLN 0.58 versus a fair value of PLN 0.08 (-87%), while NetEase trades at $130 versus $171 (+31%).

NetEase has the higher quality score (73/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.