STOCK COMPARISON
Wesfarmers vs Enbridge: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Wesfarmers (WES) and Enbridge (ENB) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Enbridge as the less overvalued of the two: Wesfarmers trades at A$91.00 versus a fair value of A$50.50 (-45%), while Enbridge trades at $51.70 versus $47.20 (-9%).
Wesfarmers
WES.AU · AUD · Consumer Discretionary
-45%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$91.00
Fair ValueA$50.50
Quality71/100
Enbridge
ENB · USD · Energy
-9%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$51.70
Fair Value$47.20
Quality47/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
WesfarmersEnbridge
Valuation
34.4×P/E (TTM)26.9×
1.60×P/S (TTM)1.78×
8.10×P/B1.43×
16.8×EV/EBITDA12.9×
1.51×PEG5.32×
2.3%Dividend yield6.8%
A$2.13Dividend per share$3.80
Profitability
7%Net margin10%
10%Operating margin15%
36%Return on equity10%
9%Return on assets3%
Growth
3%Revenue growth (YoY)21%
7.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)6.9%
8.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)10.8%
Balance & size
0.51×Debt / equity1.15×
$74BMarket cap$123B
mixedGrowth qualityexpensive
Enbridge leads: 6 to 8 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Wesfarmersof which business quality 67 · market factors 68
Enbridgeof which business quality 39 · market factors 63
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
80
29
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
50
49
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
56
57
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
56
18
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
91
20
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
81
86
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
59
51
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
69
56
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
81
62
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Wesfarmers
DCF ModelsA$56.53
Earnings-BasedA$23.35
MultiplesA$47.68
Asset-BasedA$5.42
Growth DCFA$52.69
Economic ProfitA$27.36
Growth EarningsA$41.17
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Enbridge
DCF Models$33.30
Earnings-Based$47.20
Dividend Discount$95.43
Multiples$58.32
Asset-Based$26.24
Growth DCF$18.70
Economic Profit$18.87
Growth Earnings$68.98
15 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Wesfarmers
Bear A$34.35Fair Value A$50.50Bull A$65.44
A$91.00 = current price (white tick)
Enbridge
Bear $36.02Fair Value $47.20Bull $60.03
$51.70 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Wesfarmers · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score71 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-45% · below median
Enbridge · Energy
Quality score47 · below median
Fair value upside-9% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Enbridge as the less overvalued of the two: Wesfarmers trades at A$91.00 versus a fair value of A$50.50 (-45%), while Enbridge trades at $51.70 versus $47.20 (-9%).
Wesfarmers has the higher quality score (71/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
