EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Entre Cua Socimi vs Goodman: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Entre Cua Socimi (YENT) and Goodman (GMG) compare, as of Aug 11, 2026.

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Entre Cua Socimi as the less overvalued of the two: Entre Cua Socimi trades at €1.78 versus a fair value of €0.81 (-54%), while Goodman trades at A$29.93 versus A$7.37 (-75%).
Entre Cua Socimi
YENT.MC · EUR · Real Estate
-54%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€1.78
Fair Value€0.81
Quality62/100
Goodman
GMG.AU · AUD · Real Estate
-75%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceA$29.93
Fair ValueA$7.37
Quality61/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Entre Cua SocimiGoodman
Valuation
45.0×P/E (TTM)35.5×
15.73×P/S (TTM)13.96×
1.68×P/B1.86×
27.0×EV/EBITDA24.5×
PEG2.72×
1.0%Dividend yield1.0%
€0.02Dividend per shareA$0.30
Profitability
24%Net margin55%
18%Operating margin56%
3%Return on equity8%
1%Return on assets4%
Growth
1%Revenue growth (YoY)-16%
12.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.4%
5.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)8.1%
Balance & size
0.12×Debt / equity0.20×
$118MMarket cap$43B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Goodman leads: 4 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Entre Cua Socimiof which business quality 61 · market factors 51 Goodmanof which business quality 61 · market factors 44
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
32
38
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
38
62
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
97
76
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
57
74
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
96
57
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
100
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
39
36
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
16
32
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
53
55

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Entre Cua Socimi

DCF Models€0.72
Multiples€0.68
Asset-Based€0.83
Growth DCF€0.69
Economic Profit€0.76

14 of 14 models see the stock below the current price.

Goodman

DCF ModelsA$7.40
Dividend DiscountA$4.92
MultiplesA$6.55
Asset-BasedA$7.64
Growth DCFA$8.19
Economic ProfitA$9.80

16 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Entre Cua Socimi
Bear €0.58Fair Value €0.81Bull €0.85
€1.78 = current price (white tick)
Goodman
Bear A$4.54Fair Value A$7.37Bull A$10.49
A$29.93 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Entre Cua Socimi · Real Estate

Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-54% · bottom 25%

Goodman · Real Estate

Quality score61 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-75% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Entre Cua Socimi as the less overvalued of the two: Entre Cua Socimi trades at €1.78 versus a fair value of €0.81 (-54%), while Goodman trades at A$29.93 versus A$7.37 (-75%).

Entre Cua Socimi has the higher quality score (62/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.