Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1709 (1709) Fair Value & Analysis

Financial Services · Market cap HK$2.3B

1 1709 1709 · HK
PriceHK$1.16
Fair ValueHK$1.17
Upside+0.9%
Quality41/100
Watch 1709 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: High Range HK$0.8800 – HK$1.46

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price −14.1% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$4.11 HK$1.03 Fair Value HK$1.17 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$1.03 – HK$4.11 · fair‑value band HK$0.8800 – HK$1.46 · the HK$1.16 price screens below the HK$1.17 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1709 (1709) currently trades at HK$1.16, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.17 — implying the stock looks roughly 0.9% undervalued today. We read business quality at 41/100 (below-average quality), in the Financial Services sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Trailing-twelve-month revenue stands at HK$220M. Revenue grew 92.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 27.4%. Net debt stands at HK$178M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$220M
Revenue growth (YoY) +92.6%
Net margin 150%
Return on equity 27.4%
Free cash flow HK$9.6M FY2025
P/E ratio 5.6
More key figures
Operating margin 11.2%
EPS (TTM) HK$0.2200
EPS growth (YoY) +2,374%
Net debt HK$178M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1709 reported revenue of HK$190M in FY2025 versus HK$423M in FY2021, a compound −18.2%/yr. Reported net income was HK$137M in FY2025, compounding −9.1%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −18.2%/yr
FY21 HK$423M
FY22 HK$300M
FY23 HK$179M
FY24 HK$202M
FY25 HK$190M
Net income −9.1%/yr
FY21 HK$201M
FY22 HK$110M
FY23 −HK$49.2M
FY24 HK$99.9M
FY25 HK$137M

Is 1709 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Financial Conglomerates stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
ORIX Corporation IX $40.15 $61.35 +53%
Bajaj Finserv Ltd BAJAJFINSV ₹1,664 ₹797.07 -52%
Yuanta Financial Holding 2885 61.60 TWD 71.14 TWD +15%
China Galaxy Securities Co 601881 ¥12.10 ¥24.20 +100%
Guosen Securities Co 002736 ¥10.04 ¥14.05 +40%
CNPC Capital Company 000617 ¥7.17 ¥6.44 -10%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Financial Services stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1709 (1709) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.17 versus a price of HK$1.16 — about +1% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1709?
Our model-based fair value for 1709 is HK$1.17 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$1.16.
What is the quality score of 1709?
1709 has a Quality Score of 41/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1709 (1709)?
1709 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$220M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1709?
The net profit margin of 1709 is about 149.8%, meaning it keeps roughly 149.8% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.