Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1933 (1933) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · Market cap HK$94.6M

1 1933 1933 · HK
PriceHK$0.1870
Fair ValueHK$0.0500
Upside-73.3%
Quality49/100
Watch 1933 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.0400 – HK$0.0700

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 6 valuation models · updated today

Share price −13.0% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.4500 HK$0.1180 Fair Value HK$0.0500 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1180 – HK$0.4500 · fair‑value band HK$0.0400 – HK$0.0700 · the HK$0.1870 price screens above the HK$0.0500 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1933 (1933) currently trades at HK$0.1870, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0500 — implying the stock looks roughly 73.3% overvalued today. We read business quality at 49/100 (below-average quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1933 generated revenue of HK$219M at a net margin of -60.9%. Revenue declined 53.4% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -77.1%. Net debt stands at HK$97.8M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$219M
Revenue growth (YoY) -53.4%
Net margin -60.9%
Return on equity -77.1%
Free cash flow HK$1.2M FY2025
Operating margin -59.3%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.1900
EPS growth (YoY) -75.8%
Net debt HK$97.8M FY2026

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2026 · reported fiscal years

1933 reported revenue of HK$211M in FY2026 versus HK$377M in FY2022, a compound −13.4%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$129M in FY2026.

Revenue −13.4%/yr
FY22 HK$377M
FY23 HK$450M
FY24 HK$491M
FY25 HK$378M
FY26 HK$211M
Net income
FY22 HK$22.0M
FY23 HK$32.6M
FY24 HK$8.4M
FY25 −HK$37.6M
FY26 −HK$129M

Is 1933 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Information Technology Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
International Business Machines Corporation IBM $272.36 $174.70 -36%
Accenture plc ACN $178.86 $228.49 +28%
Tata Consultancy Services Limited TCS ₹2,199 ₹1,863 -15%
Infosys Limited INFY ₹1,065 ₹15.23 -99%
HCL Technologies Limited HCLTECH ₹1,155 ₹1,220 +6%
Fiserv, Inc FISV 930.00 MXN 109.65 MXN -88%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Technology stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1933 (1933) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0500 versus a price of HK$0.1870 — about −73% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1933?
Our model-based fair value for 1933 is HK$0.0500 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1870.
What is the quality score of 1933?
1933 has a Quality Score of 49/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1933 (1933)?
1933 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$219M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1933?
The net profit margin of 1933 is about -60.9%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.