1973 (1973) Fair Value & Analysis

Financial Services · Market cap HK$1.6B

1 1973 1973 · HK

PriceHK$2.34

Fair ValueHK$4.68

Upside+100.0%

Quality48/100

Watch 1973 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$3.51 – HK$5.85

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 17 valuation models · updated today

Share price +17.0% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$1.60 – HK$3.66 · fair‑value band HK$3.51 – HK$5.85 · the HK$2.34 price screens below the HK$4.68 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1973 (1973) currently trades at HK$2.34, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$4.68 — implying the stock looks roughly 100.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 48/100 (below-average quality), in the Financial Services sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Trailing-twelve-month revenue stands at HK$21.7M. Revenue grew 58.7% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 0.9%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$364M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$21.7M

Revenue growth (YoY) +58.7%

Net margin 269%

Return on equity 0.9%

Free cash flow −HK$83.5M FY2025

P/E ratio 7.3

More key figures

Operating margin 146%

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0122

Net cash HK$364M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1973 reported revenue of HK$47.4M in FY2025 versus HK$2.0B in FY2021, a compound −60.9%/yr. Reported net income was HK$191M in FY2025, compounding −28.3%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −60.9%/yr

FY21 HK$2.0B

FY22 HK$1.2B

FY23 −HK$769M

FY24 −HK$662M

FY25 HK$47.4M

Net income −28.3%/yr

FY21 HK$720M

FY22 HK$559M

FY23 −HK$873M

FY24 −HK$891M

FY25 HK$191M

Is 1973 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Asset Management stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Fondul Proprietatea SA FP	$0.0420	$0.0800	+90%
The Schiehallion Fund Limited MNTN	$2.27	$4.54	+100%
BLK BLK	17,417 MXN	10,294 MXN	-41%
BlackRock, Inc UU2	€923.80	€569.37	-38%
BH Macro Limited BHMU	$4.42	$8.84	+100%
Blackstone Inc BX	$123.26	$52.88	-57%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Financial Services stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1973 (1973) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$4.68 versus a price of HK$2.34 — about +100% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1973?

Our model-based fair value for 1973 is HK$4.68 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$2.34.

What is the quality score of 1973?

1973 has a Quality Score of 48/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1973 (1973)?

1973 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$21.7M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.