Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1985 (1985) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · Market cap HK$1.1B

1 1985 1985 · HK
PriceHK$3.40
Fair ValueHK$0.5400
Upside-84.1%
Quality70/100
Watch 1985 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: High Range HK$0.4100 – HK$0.6800

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 23 valuation models · updated today

Share price +120.8% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$3.80 HK$1.12 Fair Value HK$0.5400 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$1.12 – HK$3.80 · fair‑value band HK$0.4100 – HK$0.6800 · the HK$3.40 price screens above the HK$0.5400 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1985 (1985) currently trades at HK$3.40, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.5400 — implying the stock looks roughly 84.1% overvalued today. We read business quality at 70/100 (solid quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1985 generated revenue of HK$1.4B at a net margin of -0.1%. Revenue declined 8.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -0.8%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$90.9M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$1.4B
Revenue growth (YoY) -8.6%
Net margin -0.1%
Return on equity -0.8%
Free cash flow HK$79.2M FY2025
Operating margin -0.5%
More key figures
EPS growth (YoY) -82.2%
Net cash HK$90.9M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1985 reported revenue of HK$1.5B in FY2025 versus HK$1.1B in FY2021, a compound +7.6%/yr. Reported net income was HK$8.2M in FY2025, compounding −35.6%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +7.6%/yr
FY21 HK$1.1B
FY22 HK$1.1B
FY23 HK$1.2B
FY24 HK$1.2B
FY25 HK$1.5B
Net income −35.6%/yr
FY21 HK$47.3M
FY22 HK$32.0M
FY23 HK$33.2M
FY24 HK$36.2M
FY25 HK$8.2M

Is 1985 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Information Technology Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
International Business Machines Corporation IBM $301.77 $153.91 -49%
Accenture plc ACN $124.83 $250.14 +100%
Tata Consultancy Services Limited TCS ₹2,154 ₹2,580 +20%
Infosys Limited INFY ₹1,144 ₹1,305 +14%
HCL Technologies Limited HCLTECH ₹1,131 ₹2,568 +127%
Fiserv, Inc FISV 930.00 MXN 1,302 MXN +40%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Technology stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1985 (1985) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.5400 versus a price of HK$3.40 — about −84% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1985?
Our model-based fair value for 1985 is HK$0.5400 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$3.40.
What is the quality score of 1985?
1985 has a Quality Score of 70/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1985 (1985)?
1985 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$1.4B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1985?
The net profit margin of 1985 is about -0.1%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.