Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Chalice Mining Limited (CGMLF) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · US · Market cap $389M

Price$0.8945
Fair Value$0.6900
Upside-22.9%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range $0.5200 – $0.8600

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Chalice Mining Limited (CGMLF) currently trades at $0.8945, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.6900 — implying the stock looks roughly 22.9% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Chalice Mining Limited operates as a mineral exploration and evaluation company. It explores for gold, copper, cobalt, palladium, platinum, and nickel deposits. The company also has interest in the Gonneville Palladium-Nickel-Copper Project and in the exploration of projects located in the West Yilgarn region of Western Australia. Chalice Mining Limited was incorporated in 2005 and is based in West Perth, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Chalice Mining Limited (CGMLF) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $0.6900 versus a price of $0.8945 — about −23% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of CGMLF?
Our 21-model fair value for Chalice Mining Limited is $0.6900 (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $0.8945.
What is the quality score of CGMLF?
Chalice Mining Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.