Digital Brands Group (DBGI) Fair Value & Analysis
Consumer Cyclical · US · Market cap $17.1M
Fair value as of: Jun 25, 2026
Analysis
Digital Brands Group (DBGI) currently trades at $0.7324, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.2600 — implying the stock looks roughly 64.5% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).
About the company
Digital Brands Group, Inc. engages in the provision of various apparel products through direct-to-consumer and wholesale distribution. The company offers women's clothing, including dresses, tops, jumpsuits, bottoms, sets, shirts, sweaters, skirts, shorts, athleisure bottoms, and other accessory products, as well as t-shirts, jackets and rompers. It sells its products under the Bailey 44, Stateside, DSTLD, Sundry, and AVO Studios brand names. The company sells directly to the consumer through its websites and showrooms, as well as through its wholesale channel in specialty stores, third-party online stores, and select department stores. The company was formerly known as Denim.LA, Inc. Digital Brands Group, Inc. was incorporated in 2012 and is headquartered in Austin, Texas.
Open the full interactive analysis →
Similar stocks
Frequently asked questions
Is Digital Brands Group (DBGI) undervalued?
What is the fair value of DBGI?
What is the quality score of DBGI?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.