Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Green Technology Metals Limited (GTMLF) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · US · Market cap $16.1M

Price$0.0150
Fair Value$0.0203
Upside+35.0%
Quality87/100
Evidence: Low Range $0.0188 – $0.0248

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

Green Technology Metals Limited (GTMLF) currently trades at $0.0150, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.0203 — implying the stock looks roughly 35.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 87/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Green Technology Metals Limited engages in the mineral exploration and development business in Canada. Its flagship project is the Seymour project that covers an area of approximately 15,140 hectares located in Thunder Bay. The company was incorporated in 2021 and is headquartered in Subiaco, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

BHP Group (BHP) -45% Rio Tinto Group (RTNTF) -41% Grupo México, S.A. (GMBXF) -6% CMOC Group (CMCLY) -19% Vale S.A (VALEN) -37% Anglo American plc (AAUKF) -73%

Frequently asked questions

Is Green Technology Metals Limited (GTMLF) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $0.0203 versus a price of $0.0150 — about +35% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of GTMLF?
Our 21-model fair value for Green Technology Metals Limited is $0.0203 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $0.0150.
What is the quality score of GTMLF?
Green Technology Metals Limited has a Quality Score of 87/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.