Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Rokeby Resources Limited (RKB) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$9.1M

PriceA$0.0035
Fair ValueA$0.0200
Upside+471.4%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range A$0.0100 – A$0.0200

Fair value as of: Jun 25, 2026

Analysis

Rokeby Resources Limited (RKB) currently trades at A$0.0035, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.0200 — implying the stock looks roughly 471.4% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Rokeby Resources Limited, a junior resource company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, evaluation, and development of mineral properties in Australia. The company explores for gold, base metals, antimony, copper, lead, zinc, and silver deposits. The company has acquired the Omeo Gold Project located near the Omeo township in north east Victoria. The company was formerly known as Inca Minerals Limited and changed its name to Rokeby Resources Limited in July 2025. The company is based in West Perth, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Rokeby Resources Limited (RKB) undervalued?
As of Jun 25, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.0200 versus a price of A$0.0035 — about +471% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of RKB?
Our 21-model fair value for Rokeby Resources Limited is A$0.0200 (as of Jun 25, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.0035.
What is the quality score of RKB?
Rokeby Resources Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.