EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Samsung Electronics Co vs Casio Computer Co Ltd: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Samsung Electronics Co (005930) and Casio Computer Co Ltd (CSIOY) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Casio Computer Co Ltd as the less overvalued of the two: Samsung Electronics Co trades at KRW 285,500 versus a fair value of KRW 163,849 (-43%), while Casio Computer Co Ltd trades at $147 versus $94.14 (-36%).
Samsung Electronics Co
005930.KO · KRW · Information Technology
-43%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceKRW 285,500
Fair ValueKRW 163,849
Quality70/100
Casio Computer Co Ltd
CSIOY · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-36%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$147
Fair Value$94.14
Quality72/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Samsung Electronics CoCasio Computer Co Ltd
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)29.3×
n/aP/S (TTM)1.92×
n/aP/B2.25×
n/aEV/EBITDA14.4×
0.18×PEG1.32×
−42.6%Fair value upside−35.9%
0.5%Dividend yield2.7%
KRW 1,488Dividend per share$45.00
Profitability
43%Operating margin7%
0.86×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.24×
19%Return on equity8%
10%Return on assets4%
Growth
69%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
3.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.5%
7.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)5.2%
+12.0%Value creation/yr+3.6%
Balance & size
72.0×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)40.8×
0.01×Debt / equity0.18×
$1.3TMarket cap$3B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Samsung Electronics Co leads: 7 to 4 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Samsung Electronics Coof which business quality 67 · market factors 60 Casio Computer Co Ltdof which business quality 70 · market factors 80
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
48
49
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
68
70
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
60
49
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
86
88
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
49
89
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
12
50
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
76
95
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
87
90
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
92
91

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familySamsung Electronics CoPrice KRW 285,500Casio Computer Co LtdPrice $147
DCF Models-42%below the priceKRW 165,947-32%below the price$99.88
Earnings-Based-75%below the priceKRW 72,540-62%below the price$55.96
Dividend Discount-89%below the priceKRW 32,330n/a
Multiples-44%below the priceKRW 160,812-21%below the price$117
Asset-Based-83%below the priceKRW 49,320-68%below the price$46.39
Growth DCF-58%below the priceKRW 120,435-36%below the price$93.72
Economic Profit-69%below the priceKRW 87,714-57%below the price$62.92
Growth Earnings-34%below the priceKRW 188,865-36%below the price$94.14
Minimum-89%below the priceKRW 32,330-68%below the price$46.39
Maximum-34%below the priceKRW 188,865-21%below the price$117
Median-64%below the priceKRW 104,074-36%below the price$93.72
Geometric mean-67%below the priceKRW 94,120-47%below the price$77.51

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Samsung Electronics Co: 25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Casio Computer Co Ltd: 22 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Samsung Electronics Co
Price KRW 285,500
Fair Value KRW 163,849
Bear KRW 100,182Bull KRW 232,887
Casio Computer Co Ltd
Price $147
Fair Value $94.14
Bear $71.77Bull $134

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Samsung Electronics Co · Information Technology

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-43% · below median

Casio Computer Co Ltd · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-36% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Casio Computer Co Ltd as the less overvalued of the two: Samsung Electronics Co trades at KRW 285,500 versus a fair value of KRW 163,849 (-43%), while Casio Computer Co Ltd trades at $147 versus $94.14 (-36%).

Casio Computer Co Ltd has the higher quality score (72/100).

Open Casio Computer Co Ltd live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.