EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Elife Holdings vs Applovin: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Elife Holdings (0223) and Applovin (APP) compare, as of Sep 6, 2026.

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Applovin as the less overvalued of the two: Elife Holdings trades at HK$0.07 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (-65%), while Applovin trades at $321 versus $252 (-21%).
Elife Holdings
0223.HK · HKD · Industrials
-65%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.07
Fair ValueHK$0.03
Quality25/100
Applovin
APP · USD · Information Technology
-21%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$321
Fair Value$252
Quality92/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Elife HoldingsApplovin
Valuation
P/E (TTM)45.3×
0.17×P/S (TTM)27.63×
0.40×P/B
EV/EBITDA35.2×
0.67×PEG1.43×
−65.1%Fair value upside−21.2%
0.5%Dividend yield
Profitability
3%Operating margin78%
-39%Return on equity266%
-3%Return on assets44%
Growth
-49%Revenue growth (YoY)59%
5.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)24.8%
26.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)30.4%
Value creation/yr+97.7%
Balance & size
Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)20.1×
0.05×Debt / equity1.65×
$20MMarket cap$170B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Applovin leads: 2 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Elife Holdingsof which business quality 28 · market factors 12 Applovinof which business quality 86 · market factors 0
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
24
91
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
21
98
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
2
87
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
49
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
84
81
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
37
0
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
3
0
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
0
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
98

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyElife HoldingsPrice HK$0.07ApplovinPrice $321
DCF Modelsn/a+19%above the price$383
Earnings-Basedn/a+19%above the price$382
Dividend Discount-86%below the priceHK$0.01-100%below the price$0.17
Multiplesn/a-45%below the price$176
Asset-Based-73%below the priceHK$0.02-99%below the price$4.68
Growth DCFn/a+25%above the price$402
Economic Profitn/a-52%below the price$155
Growth Earningsn/a+72%above the price$551
Minimum-86%below the priceHK$0.01-100%below the price$0.17
Maximum-73%below the priceHK$0.02+72%above the price$551
Median-79%below the priceHK$0.02-13%close to the price$279
Geometric mean-81%below the priceHK$0.01-78%below the price$71.48

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Elife Holdings: 3 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.

Applovin: 13 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Applovin
Bear $176Fair Value $252Bull $601
$321 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Elife Holdings · Industrials

Quality score25 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-65% · bottom 25%

Applovin · Information Technology

Quality score92 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-21% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 6, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Applovin as the less overvalued of the two: Elife Holdings trades at HK$0.07 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (-65%), while Applovin trades at $321 versus $252 (-21%).

Applovin has the higher quality score (92/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.