EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Hua Lien International Holding Co vs Mondelez International: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Hua Lien International Holding Co (0969) and Mondelez International (MDLZ) compare, as of Sep 30, 2026.

As of Sep 30, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Mondelez International as the less overvalued of the two: Hua Lien International Holding Co trades at HK$0.12 versus a fair value of HK$0.02 (−83.3%), while Mondelez International trades at $59.32 versus $46.56 (−21.5%).
Hua Lien International Holding Co
0969.HK · HKD · Industrials
−83.3%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.12
Fair ValueHK$0.02
Quality39/100
Mondelez International
MDLZ · USD · Consumer Staples
−21.5%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$59.32
Fair Value$46.56
Quality59/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Hua Lien International Holding CoMondelez International
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)22.0×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)17.7×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, reported earnings)22.5×
0.27×P/S (TTM)1.93×
Negative equityP/B2.97× · book value is mostly goodwill
n/aEV/EBITDA15.1×
n/aPEG0.90×
−83.3%Fair value upside−21.5%
n/aDividend yield3.4%
n/aDividend per share$2.00
Profitability
-55.1%Operating margin22.0%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)0.65×
Negative equityReturn on equity13.3%
-14.4%Return on assets4.1%
Growth
-13.2%Revenue growth (YoY)4.1%
-4.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)7.0%
1.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.7%
n/aValue creation/yr+4.2%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.0×
Negative equityDebt / equity0.67×
$34MMarket cap$77B
weakGrowth qualitymixed
Mondelez International, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings: 22.5.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Mondelez International leads: 0 to 6 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Hua Lien International Holding Coof which business quality 39 · market factors 49 Mondelez Internationalof which business quality 55 · market factors 58
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
35
35
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
33
21
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
61
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
50
45
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
56
97
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
91
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
50
44
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
45
45
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
92

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyHua Lien International Holding CoPrice HK$0.12Mondelez InternationalPrice $59.32
DCF Modelsn/a−55.0%below the price$26.71
Earnings-Basedn/a−70.6%below the price$17.43
Dividend Discountn/a−61.0%below the price$23.14
Multiplesn/a−41.8%below the price$34.52
Asset-Basedn/a−77.1%below the price$13.56
Growth DCFn/a−54.1%below the price$27.22
Economic Profitn/a−72.7%below the price$16.18
Growth Earningsn/a−48.6%below the price$30.51
Minimumn/a−77.1%below the price$13.56
Maximumn/a−41.8%below the price$34.52
Mediann/a−58.0%below the price$24.92
Geometric meann/a−61.9%below the price$22.58

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Mondelez International: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Mondelez International
Price $59.32
Fair Value $46.56
Bear $31.32Bull $71.04

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Hua Lien International Holding Co · Industrials

Quality score39 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−83.3% · bottom 25%

Mondelez International · Consumer Staples

Quality score59 · above median
Fair value upside−21.5% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 30, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Mondelez International as the less overvalued of the two: Hua Lien International Holding Co trades at HK$0.12 versus a fair value of HK$0.02 (−83.3%), while Mondelez International trades at $59.32 versus $46.56 (−21.5%).

Mondelez International has the higher quality score (59/100).

Open Mondelez International live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.