EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings vs Nike: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings (1121) and Nike (NKE) compare, as of Aug 16, 2026.

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nike as the less overvalued of the two: Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings trades at HK$0.33 versus a fair value of HK$0.24 (-27%), while Nike trades at $40.73 versus $35.63 (-13%).
Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings
1121.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
-27%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.33
Fair ValueHK$0.24
Quality28/100
Nike
NKE · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-13%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$40.73
Fair Value$35.63
Quality76/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Golden Solar New Energy Technology HoldingsNike
Valuation
P/E (TTM)20.4×
0.85×P/S (TTM)1.37×
0.50×P/B4.26×
EV/EBITDA14.1×
PEG1.69×
4.3%Dividend yield3.8%
Dividend per share$1.63
Profitability
-199%Net margin7%
-161%Operating margin12%
-95%Return on equity22%
-30%Return on assets6%
Growth
-27%Revenue growth (YoY)-1%
-17.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.2%
6.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)0.8%
Balance & size
0.08×Debt / equity0.54×
$132MMarket cap$63B
expensiveGrowth qualityweak

Nike leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdingsof which business quality 28 · market factors 15 Nikeof which business quality 70 · market factors 23
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
2
70
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
0
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
8
56
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
36
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
94
95
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
52
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
0
16
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
1
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
63
92

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings

Dividend DiscountHK$0.20
Asset-BasedHK$0.09

3 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.

Nike

DCF Models$39.14
Earnings-Based$18.25
Dividend Discount$26.69
Multiples$36.33
Asset-Based$6.72
Growth DCF$37.37
Economic Profit$20.91
Growth Earnings$40.93

19 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings
Bear HK$0.22Fair Value HK$0.24Bull HK$0.27
HK$0.33 = current price (white tick)
Nike
Bear $23.75Fair Value $35.63Bull $44.54
$40.73 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score28 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-27% · below median

Nike · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score76 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-13% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Nike as the less overvalued of the two: Golden Solar New Energy Technology Holdings trades at HK$0.33 versus a fair value of HK$0.24 (-27%), while Nike trades at $40.73 versus $35.63 (-13%).

Nike has the higher quality score (76/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.