EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv vs Plaza S.A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv (1209) and Plaza S.A (MALLPLAZA) compare, as of Aug 14, 2026.

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Plaza S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv trades at HK$39.84 versus a fair value of HK$34.92 (-12%), while Plaza S.A trades at CLP 3,928 versus CLP 4,571 (+16%).
China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv
1209.HK · HKD · Real Estate
-12%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$39.84
Fair ValueHK$34.92
Quality81/100
Plaza S.A
MALLPLAZA.SN · CLP · Real Estate
+16%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceCLP 3,928
Fair ValueCLP 4,571
Quality65/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

China Resources Mixc Lifestyle ServPlaza S.A
Valuation
18.2×P/E (TTM)5.9×
4.65×P/S (TTM)0.01×
5.41×P/B—
15.4×EV/EBITDA2.3×
2.8%Dividend yield1.8%
HK$1.04Dividend per shareCLP 68
Profitability
22%Net margin—
24%Operating margin78%
25%Return on equity37%
10%Return on assets5%
Growth
4%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
14.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)19.4%
21.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)28.4%
Balance & size
0.01×Debt / equity0.32×
$11BMarket cap$9B
healthyGrowth qualitymixed

Plaza S.A leads: 3 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Servof which business quality 76 · market factors 44 Plaza S.Aof which business quality 64 · market factors 72
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
68
63
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
61
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
76
75
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
86
62
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
89
33
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
72
68
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
30
67
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
37
86
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
62

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv

DCF ModelsHK$47.33
Dividend DiscountHK$37.62
MultiplesHK$31.17
Asset-BasedHK$4.54
Growth DCFHK$48.93
Economic ProfitHK$12.50

6 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Plaza S.A

DCF ModelsCLP 5,184
Dividend DiscountCLP 946
MultiplesCLP 3,939
Asset-BasedCLP 1,371
Growth DCFCLP 5,933
Economic ProfitCLP 8,618

7 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv
Bear HK$25.76Fair Value HK$34.92Bull HK$44.94
HK$39.84 = current price (white tick)
Plaza S.A
Bear CLP 2,761Fair Value CLP 4,571Bull CLP 10,216
CLP 3,928 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv · Real Estate

Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-12% · below median

Plaza S.A · Real Estate

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+16% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Plaza S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv trades at HK$39.84 versus a fair value of HK$34.92 (-12%), while Plaza S.A trades at CLP 3,928 versus CLP 4,571 (+16%).

China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv has the higher quality score (81/100).

See the full analysis →
China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv · Plaza S.A

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to China Resources Mixc Lifestyle Serv

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Plaza S.A

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.