Niraku GC Holdings vs Las Vegas Sands: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Niraku GC Holdings (1245) and Las Vegas Sands (LVS) compare, as of Aug 16, 2026.
As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Las Vegas Sands as the more attractively valued of the two: Niraku GC Holdings trades at HK$0.21 versus a fair value of HK$0.16 (-26%), while Las Vegas Sands trades at $46.23 versus $51.60 (+12%).
Niraku GC Holdings
1245.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
-26%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.21
Fair ValueHK$0.16
Quality63/100
Las Vegas Sands
LVS · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+12%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$46.23
Fair Value$51.60
Quality70/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Niraku GC HoldingsLas Vegas Sands
Valuation
2.6×P/E (TTM)17.0×
—P/S (TTM)2.16×
—P/B18.66×
—EV/EBITDA8.4×
—PEG0.93×
13.0%Dividend yield2.4%
HK$0.44Dividend per share$1.10
Profitability
6%Net margin13%
13%Operating margin25%
9%Return on equity90%
4%Return on assets10%
Growth
9%Revenue growth (YoY)25%
10.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)46.9%
12.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)34.7%
Balance & size
0.24×Debt / equity9.22×
$28MMarket cap$30B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy
Las Vegas Sands leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Niraku GC Holdingsof which business quality 60 · market factors 65Las Vegas Sandsof which business quality 64 · market factors 33
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
45
60
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
61
58
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
89
86
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
71
65
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
59
24
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
69
13
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Niraku GC Holdings
DCF ModelsHK$0.17
Earnings-BasedHK$0.09
MultiplesHK$0.16
Asset-BasedHK$0.05
Growth DCFHK$0.15
Economic ProfitHK$0.08
Growth EarningsHK$0.13
19 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.
Las Vegas Sands
DCF Models$50.41
Earnings-Based$31.58
Dividend Discount$22.12
Multiples$38.80
Asset-Based$1.61
Growth DCF$33.44
Economic Profit$30.87
Growth Earnings$49.90
14 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Niraku GC Holdings
Bear HK$0.12Fair Value HK$0.16Bull HK$0.20
HK$0.21 = current price (white tick)
Las Vegas Sands
Bear $22.10Fair Value $51.60Bull $67.52
$46.23 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Niraku GC Holdings · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-26% · below median
Las Vegas Sands · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+12% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 16, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Las Vegas Sands as the more attractively valued of the two: Niraku GC Holdings trades at HK$0.21 versus a fair value of HK$0.16 (-26%), while Las Vegas Sands trades at $46.23 versus $51.60 (+12%).
Las Vegas Sands has the higher quality score (70/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
