GC Construction Holdings vs Quanta Services: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how GC Construction Holdings (1489) and Quanta Services (PWR) compare, as of Aug 24, 2026.
As of Aug 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees GC Construction Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: GC Construction Holdings trades at HK$1.28 versus a fair value of HK$0.41 (-68%), while Quanta Services trades at $639 versus $144 (-77%).
GC Construction Holdings
1489.HK · HKD · Industrials
-68%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$1.28
Fair ValueHK$0.41
Quality58/100
Quanta Services
PWR · USD · Industrials
-77%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$639
Fair Value$144
Quality50/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
GC Construction HoldingsQuanta Services
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)91.8×
0.63×P/S (TTM)3.33×
0.77×P/B11.22×
—EV/EBITDA39.5×
—PEG1.84×
0.2%Dividend yield0.1%
—Dividend per share$0.42
Profitability
-23%Net margin4%
-50%Operating margin4%
-25%Return on equity14%
-13%Return on assets5%
Growth
-61%Revenue growth (YoY)26%
-21.7%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)18.4%
-10.0%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.4%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.59×
$163MMarket cap$100B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
Quanta Services leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
GC Construction Holdingsof which business quality 61 · market factors 83Quanta Servicesof which business quality 52 · market factors 62
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
16
45
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
16
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
36
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
41
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
100
65
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
92
83
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
72
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
GC Construction Holdings
DCF ModelsHK$0.41
Dividend DiscountHK$0.01
MultiplesHK$0.50
Asset-BasedHK$0.14
Growth DCFHK$0.45
9 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.
Quanta Services
DCF Models$212
Earnings-Based$111
Dividend Discount$7.09
Multiples$130
Asset-Based$39.91
Growth DCF$227
Economic Profit$64.82
Growth Earnings$163
26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
GC Construction Holdings
Bear HK$0.28Fair Value HK$0.41Bull HK$0.55
HK$1.28 = current price (white tick)
Quanta Services
Bear $107Fair Value $144Bull $180
$639 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
GC Construction Holdings · Industrials
Quality score58 · above median
Fair value upside-68% · bottom 25%
Quanta Services · Industrials
Quality score50 · below median
Fair value upside-77% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees GC Construction Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: GC Construction Holdings trades at HK$1.28 versus a fair value of HK$0.41 (-68%), while Quanta Services trades at $639 versus $144 (-77%).
GC Construction Holdings has the higher quality score (58/100).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
