EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Feiyang International Holdings Group vs Booking Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Feiyang International Holdings Group (1901) and Booking Holdings (BKNG) compare, as of Oct 1, 2026.

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Booking Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Feiyang International Holdings Group trades at HK$0.15 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (−79.3%), while Booking Holdings trades at $163 versus $193 (+18.5%).
Feiyang International Holdings Group
1901.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
−79.3%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.15
Fair ValueHK$0.03
Quality28/100
Booking Holdings
BKNG · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+18.5%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$163
Fair Value$193
Quality88/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Feiyang International Holdings GroupBooking Holdings
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)17.9×
n/aP/E ex one-offs (FY2025)22.7×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)13.2×
0.03×P/S (TTM)4.44×
0.60×P/BNegative equity
n/aEV/EBITDA12.0×
n/aPEG0.61×
−79.3%Fair value upside+18.5%
n/aDividend yield1.0%
n/aDividend per share$1.61
Profitability
-9.2%Operating margin34.4%
-62.8%Return on equityNegative equity
-3.7%Return on assets20.4%
Growth
-7.8%Revenue growth (YoY)8.1%
117.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)16.3%
40.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)31.7%
n/aValue creation/yr+44.4%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)5.7×
n/aDebt / equityNegative equity
$27MMarket cap$125B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

Booking Holdings leads: 3 to 4 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Feiyang International Holdings Groupof which business quality 28 · market factors 18 Booking Holdingsof which business quality 84 · market factors 33
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
24
87
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
58
43
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
9
96
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
7
83
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
89
92
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
53
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
6
32
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
3
10
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
18
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyFeiyang International Holdings GroupPrice HK$0.15Booking HoldingsPrice $163
DCF Modelsn/a+73.5%above the price$283
Earnings-Basedn/a−16.7%below the price$136
Dividend Discountn/a−82.1%below the price$29.23
Multiplesn/a−2.9%close to the price$158
Asset-Based−79.3%below the priceHK$0.03n/a
Growth DCFn/a+66.1%above the price$271
Economic Profitn/a−28.4%below the price$117
Growth Earningsn/a+18.5%above the price$193
Minimum−79.3%below the priceHK$0.03−82.1%below the price$29.23
Maximum−79.3%below the priceHK$0.03+73.5%above the price$283
Median−79.3%below the priceHK$0.03−2.9%close to the price$158
Geometric mean−79.3%below the priceHK$0.03−13.8%close to the price$140

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Feiyang International Holdings Group: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Booking Holdings: 12 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Feiyang International Holdings Group
Price HK$0.15
Fair Value HK$0.03
Bear HK$0.03Bull HK$0.05
Booking Holdings
Price $163
Fair Value $193
Bear $135Bull $251

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Feiyang International Holdings Group · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score28 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−79.3% · bottom 25%

Booking Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score88 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+18.5% · above median

Bottom line

As of Oct 1, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Booking Holdings as the more attractively valued of the two: Feiyang International Holdings Group trades at HK$0.15 versus a fair value of HK$0.03 (−79.3%), while Booking Holdings trades at $163 versus $193 (+18.5%).

Booking Holdings has the higher quality score (88/100).

Open Booking Holdings live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.