EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Bicycle Co Holdings vs ANTA Sports Products: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Bicycle Co Holdings (200017) and ANTA Sports Products (2020) compare, as of Aug 25, 2026.

As of Aug 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ANTA Sports Products as the more attractively valued of the two: China Bicycle Co Holdings trades at ¥1.64 versus a fair value of ¥0.35 (-79%), while ANTA Sports Products trades at HK$72.70 versus HK$120 (+65%).
China Bicycle Co Holdings
200017.SHE · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-79%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥1.64
Fair Value¥0.35
Quality31/100
ANTA Sports Products
2020.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
+65%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$72.70
Fair ValueHK$120
Quality64/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

China Bicycle Co HoldingsANTA Sports Products
Valuation
20.4×P/E (TTM)13.4×
1.39×P/S (TTM)2.56×
2.87×P/B3.20×
18.4×EV/EBITDA10.0×
PEG1.74×
Dividend yield3.0%
Dividend per shareHK$2.20
Profitability
6%Net margin17%
7%Operating margin21%
11%Return on equity23%
8%Return on assets10%
Growth
-18%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
52.0%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)14.3%
50.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)17.7%
Balance & size
0.25×Debt / equity0.18×
$147MMarket cap$26B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

ANTA Sports Products leads: 4 to 8 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Bicycle Co Holdingsof which business quality 34 · market factors 52 ANTA Sports Productsof which business quality 66 · market factors 41
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
41
66
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
33
38
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
6
83
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
78
78
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
31
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
77
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
36
29
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
51
15
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
75

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

China Bicycle Co Holdings

DCF Models¥0.23
Earnings-Based¥0.16
Multiples¥0.40
Asset-Based¥0.33
Economic Profit¥0.20
Growth Earnings¥0.47

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

ANTA Sports Products

DCF ModelsHK$184
Earnings-BasedHK$104
Dividend DiscountHK$44.23
MultiplesHK$95.64
Asset-BasedHK$15.51
Growth DCFHK$147
Economic ProfitHK$68.45
Growth EarningsHK$143

7 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

China Bicycle Co Holdings
Bear ¥0.26Fair Value ¥0.35Bull ¥0.44
¥1.64 = current price (white tick)
ANTA Sports Products
Bear HK$88.01Fair Value HK$120Bull HK$198
HK$72.70 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Bicycle Co Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score31 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-79% · bottom 25%

ANTA Sports Products · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+65% · Top 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ANTA Sports Products as the more attractively valued of the two: China Bicycle Co Holdings trades at ¥1.64 versus a fair value of ¥0.35 (-79%), while ANTA Sports Products trades at HK$72.70 versus HK$120 (+65%).

ANTA Sports Products has the higher quality score (64/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.