EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Yummy Town Cayman vs McDonald’s: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Yummy Town Cayman (2726) and McDonald’s (MCD) compare, as of Oct 5, 2026.

As of Oct 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Yummy Town Cayman as the less overvalued of the two: Yummy Town Cayman trades at TWD 8.00 versus a fair value of TWD 5.65 (−29.3%), while McDonald’s trades at $232 versus $163 (−29.8%).
Yummy Town Cayman
2726.TWO · TWD · Consumer Staples
−29.3%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 8.00
Fair ValueTWD 5.65
Quality33/100
McDonald’s
MCD · USD · Consumer Discretionary
−29.8%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$232
Fair Value$163
Quality69/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Yummy Town CaymanMcDonald’s
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)18.8×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)16.7×
n/aMedian P/E at FY-end (10 FY, ex one-offs where documented)25.5×
0.02×P/S (TTM)5.97×
n/aP/BNegative equity
n/aEV/EBITDA13.7×
n/aPEG2.06×
−29.3%Fair value upside−29.8%
n/aDividend yield3.2%
n/aDividend per share$7.35
Profitability
-13.2%Operating margin46.5%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.21×
-28.4%Return on equityNegative equity
-9.2%Return on assets13.3%
Growth
-7.0%Revenue growth (YoY)3.7%
-10.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.1%
-18.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
n/aValue creation/yr+11.9%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)7.8×
0.00×Debt / equityNegative equity
$9MMarket cap$165B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
McDonald’s, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 10 fiscal years (2016 to 2025), reported earnings, 5 of the years ex one-offs: 25.5.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

McDonald’s leads: 1 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Yummy Town Caymanof which business quality 33 · market factors 30 McDonald’sof which business quality 64 · market factors 39
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
32
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
38
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
5
76
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
66
53
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
60
57
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
80
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
13
20
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
6
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
0
88

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyYummy Town CaymanPrice TWD 8.00McDonald’sPrice $232
DCF Modelsn/a−40.7%below the price$138
Earnings-Basedn/a−55.8%below the price$103
Dividend Discountn/a−57.4%below the price$98.79
Multiplesn/a−2.6%close to the price$226
Asset-Based−16.0%below the priceTWD 6.72n/a
Growth DCFn/a−67.0%below the price$76.46
Economic Profitn/a−50.9%below the price$114
Growth Earningsn/a−9.5%close to the price$210
Minimum−16.0%below the priceTWD 6.72−67.0%below the price$76.46
Maximum−16.0%below the priceTWD 6.72−2.6%close to the price$226
Median−16.0%below the priceTWD 6.72−50.9%below the price$114
Geometric mean−16.0%below the priceTWD 6.72−44.6%below the price$128

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Yummy Town Cayman: 1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

McDonald’s: 19 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Yummy Town Cayman
Price TWD 8.00
Fair Value TWD 5.65
Bear TWD 4.22Bull TWD 8.43
McDonald’s
Price $232
Fair Value $163
Bear $91.85Bull $252

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Yummy Town Cayman · Consumer Staples

Quality score33 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside−29.3% · below median

McDonald’s · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−29.8% · below median

Bottom line

As of Oct 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Yummy Town Cayman as the less overvalued of the two: Yummy Town Cayman trades at TWD 8.00 versus a fair value of TWD 5.65 (−29.3%), while McDonald’s trades at $232 versus $163 (−29.8%).

McDonald’s has the higher quality score (69/100).

Open Yummy Town Cayman live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.