EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Chengdu Yunda Technology Co vs Union Pacific: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Chengdu Yunda Technology Co (300440) and Union Pacific (UNP) compare, as of Sep 28, 2026.

As of Sep 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Union Pacific as the less overvalued of the two: Chengdu Yunda Technology Co trades at ¥17.13 versus a fair value of ¥5.51 (−67.8%), while Union Pacific trades at $274 versus $153 (−43.9%).
Chengdu Yunda Technology Co
300440.SHE · CNY · Information Technology
−67.8%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥17.13
Fair Value¥5.51
Quality67/100
Union Pacific
UNP · USD · Industrials
−43.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$274
Fair Value$153
Quality65/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Chengdu Yunda Technology CoUnion Pacific
Valuation
90.2×P/E (TTM)22.2×
n/aForward P/E (FY2027)19.3×
7.49×P/S (TTM)6.40×
5.17×P/B8.81×
57.0×EV/EBITDA14.9×
n/aPEG2.72×
−67.8%Fair value upside−43.9%
0.3%Dividend yield2.0%
¥0.05Dividend per share$5.52
Profitability
-44.5%Operating margin41.0%
0.66×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.00×
5.0%Return on equity39.7%
3.6%Return on assets9.3%
Growth
-45.8%Revenue growth (YoY)11.5%
n/aAvg. growth/yr (3Y)-0.5%
n/aAvg. growth/yr (5Y)4.6%
+6.5%Value creation/yr+9.5%
Balance & size
196.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)7.5×
n/aDebt / equity1.64×
$1BMarket cap$163B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Union Pacific leads: 1 to 7 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Chengdu Yunda Technology Coof which business quality 66 · market factors 55 Union Pacificof which business quality 61 · market factors 64
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
33
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
56
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
63
71
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
84
40
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
89
47
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
54
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
51
60
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
61
60
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
89
86

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyChengdu Yunda Technology CoPrice ¥17.13Union PacificPrice $274
DCF Models−64.0%below the price¥6.18−48.1%below the price$142
Earnings-Based−82.1%below the price¥3.06−64.5%below the price$97.24
Multiples−69.4%below the price¥5.24−34.2%below the price$180
Asset-Based−85.1%below the price¥2.55−92.4%below the price$20.83
Growth DCF−67.2%below the price¥5.63−68.1%below the price$87.21
Economic Profit−82.6%below the price¥2.98−65.5%below the price$94.58
Growth Earnings−71.1%below the price¥4.95−25.4%below the price$204
Minimum−85.1%below the price¥2.55−92.4%below the price$20.83
Maximum−64.0%below the price¥6.18−25.4%below the price$204
Median−71.1%below the price¥4.95−64.5%below the price$97.24
Geometric mean−75.8%below the price¥4.14−64.2%below the price$98.08

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Chengdu Yunda Technology Co: 24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Union Pacific: 23 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Chengdu Yunda Technology Co
Price ¥17.13
Fair Value ¥5.51
Bear ¥3.47Bull ¥6.93
Union Pacific
Price $274
Fair Value $153
Bear $85.18Bull $230

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Chengdu Yunda Technology Co · Information Technology

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−67.8% · bottom 25%

Union Pacific · Industrials

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−43.9% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Union Pacific as the less overvalued of the two: Chengdu Yunda Technology Co trades at ¥17.13 versus a fair value of ¥5.51 (−67.8%), while Union Pacific trades at $274 versus $153 (−43.9%).

Chengdu Yunda Technology Co has the higher quality score (67/100).

Open Union Pacific live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.