Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. A vs Basf: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. A (301373) and Basf (BAS) compare, as of Aug 28, 2026.
As of Aug 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Basf as the less overvalued of the two: Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. A trades at ¥117 versus a fair value of ¥13.26 (-89%), while Basf trades at €51.51 versus €40.28 (-22%).
Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. A
301373.SHE · CNY · Materials
-89%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥117
Fair Value¥13.26
Quality44/100
Basf
BAS.XETRA · EUR · Materials
-22%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€51.51
Fair Value€40.28
Quality53/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. ABasf
Valuation
87.2×P/E (TTM)28.6×
34.40×P/S (TTM)0.85×
11.17×P/B1.51×
99.8×EV/EBITDA11.4×
—PEG0.71×
0.4%Dividend yield4.4%
¥0.50Dividend per share€2.25
Profitability
27%Net margin3%
30%Operating margin8%
9%Return on equity4%
5%Return on assets2%
Growth
36%Revenue growth (YoY)-3%
7.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-11.9%
—Avg. growth/yr (5Y)0.2%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.56×
$3BMarket cap$50B
expensiveGrowth qualityweak
Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. A leads: 6 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. Aof which business quality 46 · market factors 63Basfof which business quality 51 · market factors 64
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
45
33
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
45
39
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
0
91
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
30
80
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
77
51
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
76
67
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
40
84
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. A
DCF Models¥11.82
Earnings-Based¥10.42
Multiples¥20.06
Asset-Based¥10.26
Growth DCF¥6.03
Economic Profit¥14.05
Growth Earnings¥18.60
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Basf
DCF Models€9.45
Earnings-Based€10.16
Dividend Discount€25.96
Multiples€31.12
Asset-Based€25.15
Growth DCF€8.71
Economic Profit€16.25
Growth Earnings€23.76
22 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. A
Bear ¥12.46Fair Value ¥13.26Bull ¥16.36
¥117 = current price (white tick)
Basf
Bear €36.08Fair Value €40.28Bull €46.98
€51.51 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. A · Materials
Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-89% · bottom 25%
Basf · Materials
Quality score53 · above median
Fair value upside-22% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 28, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Basf as the less overvalued of the two: Guangzhou Lingwe Technology Co. Ltd. A trades at ¥117 versus a fair value of ¥13.26 (-89%), while Basf trades at €51.51 versus €40.28 (-22%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
