EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co (3347) and Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) compare, as of Aug 5, 2026.

As of Aug 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co as the less overvalued of the two: Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co trades at HK$37.72 versus a fair value of HK$23.37 (-38%), while Thermo Fisher Scientific trades at $574 versus $308 (-46%).
Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co
3347.HK · HKD · Health Care
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$37.72
Fair ValueHK$23.37
Quality51/100
Thermo Fisher Scientific
TMO · USD · Health Care
-46%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$574
Fair Value$308
Quality63/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting CoThermo Fisher Scientific
Valuation
33.1×P/E (TTM)29.5×
4.24×P/S (TTM)4.41×
1.43×P/B3.74×
34.9×EV/EBITDA20.0×
—PEG1.74×
0.4%Dividend yield0.3%
HK$0.13Dividend per share$1.76
Profitability
11%Net margin15%
10%Operating margin18%
4%Return on equity14%
1%Return on assets5%
Growth
15%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-1.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-0.3%
16.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.7%
Balance & size
0.03×Debt / equity0.67×
$4BMarket cap$199B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

Thermo Fisher Scientific leads: 6 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Coof which business quality 62 · market factors 29 Thermo Fisher Scientificof which business quality 60 · market factors 58
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
28
43
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
48
31
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
62
62
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
75
60
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
92
79
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
57
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
15
49
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
21
61
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
85
97

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co

DCF ModelsHK$34.59
Earnings-BasedHK$25.02
Dividend DiscountHK$7.03
MultiplesHK$19.08
Asset-BasedHK$16.31
Growth DCFHK$30.06
Economic ProfitHK$15.05
Growth EarningsHK$31.77

22 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Thermo Fisher Scientific

DCF Models$331
Earnings-Based$203
Multiples$310
Asset-Based$96.29
Growth DCF$288
Economic Profit$159
Growth Earnings$324

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co
Bear HK$21.89Fair Value HK$23.37Bull HK$29.12
HK$37.72 = current price (white tick)
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Bear $175Fair Value $308Bull $385
$574 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co · Health Care

Quality score51 · above median
Fair value upside-38% · above median

Thermo Fisher Scientific · Health Care

Quality score63 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-46% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co as the less overvalued of the two: Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co trades at HK$37.72 versus a fair value of HK$23.37 (-38%), while Thermo Fisher Scientific trades at $574 versus $308 (-46%).

Thermo Fisher Scientific has the higher quality score (63/100).

See the full analysis →
Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co · Thermo Fisher Scientific

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Thermo Fisher Scientific

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.