EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

OM Holdings vs BHP Group: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how OM Holdings (5298) and BHP Group (BHP) compare, as of Sep 12, 2026.

As of Sep 12, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees BHP Group as the less overvalued of the two: OM Holdings trades at MYR 0.64 versus a fair value of MYR 0.16 (-75%), while BHP Group trades at £32.31 versus £19.35 (-40%).
OM Holdings
5298.KLSE · MYR · Materials
-75%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceMYR 0.64
Fair ValueMYR 0.16
Quality56/100
BHP Group
BHP.LSE · GBX · Materials
-40%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price£32.31
Fair Value£19.35
Quality64/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

OM HoldingsBHP Group
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)19.8×
0.21×P/S (TTM)3.85×
0.31×P/B4.50×
5.5×EV/EBITDA8.2×
−74.8%Fair value upside−40.1%
0.4%Dividend yield4.0%
—Dividend per share£1.33
Profitability
1%Operating margin41%
—EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.19×
-1%Return on equity25%
1%Return on assets12%
Growth
0%Revenue growth (YoY)11%
-9.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-7.7%
-4.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)3.6%
−47.1%Value creation/yr+6.1%
Balance & size
—Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)10.4×
0.24×Debt / equity0.44×
$132MMarket cap$208B
weakGrowth qualityweak

BHP Group leads: 4 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

OM Holdingsof which business quality 56 · market factors 27 BHP Groupof which business quality 63 · market factors 75
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
24
58
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
30
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
76
75
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
52
67
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
97
61
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
62
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
16
69
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
7
93
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
76
81

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyOM HoldingsPrice MYR 0.64BHP GroupPrice £32.31
DCF Models-62%below the priceMYR 0.24-16%below the price£27.19
Earnings-Based-95%below the priceMYR 0.03-22%below the price£25.15
Dividend Discount-97%below the priceMYR 0.02-39%below the price£19.67
Multiples-92%below the priceMYR 0.05-11%close to the price£28.74
Asset-Based-42%below the priceMYR 0.37-81%below the price£6.10
Growth DCFn/a-30%below the price£22.49
Economic Profit-50%below the priceMYR 0.32-36%below the price£20.84
Growth Earnings-94%below the priceMYR 0.04-21%below the price£25.38
Minimum-97%below the priceMYR 0.02-81%below the price£6.10
Maximum-42%below the priceMYR 0.37-11%close to the price£28.74
Median-92%below the priceMYR 0.05-26%below the price£23.82
Geometric mean-86%below the priceMYR 0.09-37%below the price£20.23

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

OM Holdings: 10 of 10 models see the stock below the current price.

BHP Group: 21 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

OM Holdings
Bear MYR 0.16Fair Value MYR 0.16Bull MYR 0.26
MYR 0.64 = current price (white tick)
BHP Group
Bear £12.88Fair Value £19.35Bull £27.71
£32.31 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

OM Holdings · Materials

Quality score56 · above median
Fair value upside-75% · bottom 25%

BHP Group · Materials

Quality score64 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-40% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 12, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees BHP Group as the less overvalued of the two: OM Holdings trades at MYR 0.64 versus a fair value of MYR 0.16 (-75%), while BHP Group trades at £32.31 versus £19.35 (-40%).

BHP Group has the higher quality score (64/100).

See the full analysis →
OM Holdings · BHP Group

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to OM Holdings

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Alibaba Group Holding

Related to BHP Group

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupAmazon.com vs PDD HoldingsMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.