STOCK COMPARISON
Jilin Forest vs Coca-Cola: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Jilin Forest (600189) and Coca-Cola (KO) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Coca-Cola as the less overvalued of the two: Jilin Forest trades at ¥7.39 versus a fair value of ¥0.64 (-91%), while Coca-Cola trades at $87.05 versus $36.57 (-58%).
Jilin Forest
600189.SHG · CNY · Materials
-91%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥7.39
Fair Value¥0.64
Quality45/100
Coca-Cola
KO · USD · Consumer Staples
-58%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$87.05
Fair Value$36.57
Quality67/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Jilin ForestCoca-Cola
Valuation
245.3×P/E (TTM)25.6×
4.08×P/S (TTM)7.12×
4.29×P/B10.91×
27.1×EV/EBITDA22.9×
—PEG4.15×
—Dividend yield2.4%
—Dividend per share$2.06
Profitability
2%Net margin28%
11%Operating margin35%
4%Return on equity43%
2%Return on assets10%
Growth
10%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
-0.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)3.7%
-1.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.7%
Balance & size
0.09×Debt / equity1.31×
$781MMarket cap$351B
weakGrowth qualitymixed
Coca-Cola leads: 3 to 9 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Jilin Forestof which business quality 44 · market factors 48
Coca-Colaof which business quality 62 · market factors 77
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
18
71
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
50
59
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
62
44
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
34
51
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
82
72
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
72
96
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
43
61
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
30
83
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
34
84
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Jilin Forest
DCF Models¥2.49
Earnings-Based¥0.31
Dividend Discount¥0.76
Multiples¥1.19
Asset-Based¥1.15
Growth DCF¥2.74
Economic Profit¥1.32
Growth Earnings¥0.29
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Coca-Cola
DCF Models$28.16
Earnings-Based$22.41
Dividend Discount$31.26
Multiples$39.24
Asset-Based$5.01
Growth DCF$11.71
Economic Profit$24.81
Growth Earnings$51.37
25 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Jilin Forest
Bear ¥0.42Fair Value ¥0.64Bull ¥0.66
¥7.39 = current price (white tick)
Coca-Cola
Bear $21.38Fair Value $36.57Bull $47.76
$87.05 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Jilin Forest · Materials
Quality score45 · below median
Fair value upside-91% · bottom 25%
Coca-Cola · Consumer Staples
Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-58% · bottom 25%
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Coca-Cola as the less overvalued of the two: Jilin Forest trades at ¥7.39 versus a fair value of ¥0.64 (-91%), while Coca-Cola trades at $87.05 versus $36.57 (-58%).
Coca-Cola has the higher quality score (67/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
