EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class A vs Toyota Motor Corporation: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class A (601238) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Toyota Motor Corporation as the more attractively valued of the two: Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class A trades at ¥5.25 versus a fair value of ¥2.69 (-49%), while Toyota Motor Corporation trades at $190 versus $225 (+18%).
Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class A
601238.SHG · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-49%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥5.25
Fair Value¥2.69
Quality33/100
Toyota Motor Corporation
TM · USD · Consumer Discretionary
+18%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price$190
Fair Value$225
Quality48/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class AToyota Motor Corporation
Valuation
P/E (TTM)9.8×
0.08×P/S (TTM)
0.08×P/B
PEG1.54×
Dividend yield3.5%
Dividend per share$95.00
Profitability
-9%Net margin8%
-14%Operating margin5%
-10%Return on equity10%
-4%Return on assets2%
Growth
2%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
-4.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)10.9%
8.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)13.2%
Balance & size
0.09×Debt / equity0.64×
$8BMarket cap$213B
expensiveGrowth qualityexpensive

Toyota Motor Corporation leads: 1 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class Aof which business quality 36 · market factors 30 Toyota Motor Corporationof which business quality 45 · market factors 50
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
6
33
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
9
29
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
15
33
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
54
49
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
79
43
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
86
87
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
7
34
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
5
37
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
92

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class A

Dividend Discount¥2.48
Asset-Based¥48.28

2 of 3 models see the stock below the current price.

Toyota Motor Corporation

DCF Models$225
Earnings-Based$143
Multiples$405
Asset-Based$160
Growth DCF$175
Economic Profit$170
Growth Earnings$416

9 of 22 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class A
Bear ¥1.28Fair Value ¥2.69Bull ¥4.45
¥5.25 = current price (white tick)
Toyota Motor Corporation
Bear $194Fair Value $225Bull $427
$190 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class A · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score33 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-49% · bottom 25%

Toyota Motor Corporation · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score48 · below median
Fair value upside+18% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Toyota Motor Corporation as the more attractively valued of the two: Guangzhou Automobile Group Co Ltd Class A trades at ¥5.25 versus a fair value of ¥2.69 (-49%), while Toyota Motor Corporation trades at $190 versus $225 (+18%).

Toyota Motor Corporation has the higher quality score (48/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.