STOCK COMPARISON
Guizhou Transp Planning vs LT: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Guizhou Transp Planning (603458) and LT (LT) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees LT as the less overvalued of the two: Guizhou Transp Planning trades at ¥9.39 versus a fair value of ¥2.57 (-73%), while LT trades at ₹4,056 versus ₹1,994 (-51%).
Guizhou Transp Planning
603458.SHG · CNY · Industrials
-73%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥9.39
Fair Value¥2.57
Quality49/100
LT
LT.NSE · INR · Industrials
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price₹4,056
Fair Value₹1,994
Quality44/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Guizhou Transp PlanningLT
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)32.6×
0.51×P/S (TTM)1.80×
0.25×P/B4.80×
—EV/EBITDA16.8×
—PEG1.06×
—Dividend yield1.0%
—Dividend per share₹38.00
Profitability
-30%Net margin6%
-6%Operating margin11%
-14%Return on equity17%
-5%Return on assets5%
Growth
-24%Revenue growth (YoY)12%
-14.6%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)15.4%
-13.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)16.3%
Balance & size
0.02×Debt / equity0.58×
$648MMarket cap$55B
weakGrowth qualityhealthy
LT leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Guizhou Transp Planningof which business quality 50 · market factors 40
LTof which business quality 43 · market factors 62
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
4
36
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
16
34
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
63
40
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
50
32
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
36
89
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
41
46
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
42
59
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
90
60
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Guizhou Transp Planning
DCF Models¥5.68
Earnings-Based¥2.56
Dividend Discount¥1.39
Multiples¥2.74
Asset-Based¥5.69
Growth DCF¥6.76
Economic Profit¥2.56
15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.
LT
DCF Models₹2,695
Earnings-Based₹1,664
Dividend Discount₹649
Multiples₹2,224
Asset-Based₹532
Growth DCF₹2,304
Economic Profit₹1,397
Growth Earnings₹2,459
25 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Guizhou Transp Planning
Bear ¥2.53Fair Value ¥2.57Bull ¥2.60
¥9.39 = current price (white tick)
LT
Bear ₹1,282Fair Value ₹1,994Bull ₹3,197
₹4,056 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Guizhou Transp Planning · Industrials
Quality score49 · below median
Fair value upside-73% · bottom 25%
LT · Industrials
Quality score44 · below median
Fair value upside-51% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees LT as the less overvalued of the two: Guizhou Transp Planning trades at ¥9.39 versus a fair value of ¥2.57 (-73%), while LT trades at ₹4,056 versus ₹1,994 (-51%).
Guizhou Transp Planning has the higher quality score (49/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
