EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Guangzhou Jiacheng vs United Parcel Service: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Guangzhou Jiacheng (603535) and United Parcel Service (UPS) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees United Parcel Service as the more attractively valued of the two: Guangzhou Jiacheng trades at ¥6.34 versus a fair value of ¥3.24 (-49%), while United Parcel Service trades at $105 versus $105 (+0%).
Guangzhou Jiacheng
603535.SHG · CNY · Industrials
-49%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥6.34
Fair Value¥3.24
Quality50/100
United Parcel Service
UPS · USD · Industrials
+0%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$105
Fair Value$105
Quality62/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Guangzhou JiachengUnited Parcel Service
Valuation
P/E (TTM)19.0×
0.48×P/S (TTM)1.13×
0.20×P/B6.14×
10.3×EV/EBITDA9.9×
PEG1.85×
Dividend yield5.6%
Dividend per share$6.56
Profitability
1%Net margin6%
16%Operating margin6%
0%Return on equity33%
1%Return on assets7%
Growth
-19%Revenue growth (YoY)-2%
-4.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.9%
-0.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)1.0%
Balance & size
0.43×Debt / equity1.45×
$513MMarket cap$100B
weakGrowth qualityweak

United Parcel Service leads: 4 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Guangzhou Jiachengof which business quality 49 · market factors 26 United Parcel Serviceof which business quality 59 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
17
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
27
31
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
65
45
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
43
47
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
68
95
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
79
63
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
6
56
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
0
67
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
90
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Guangzhou Jiacheng

DCF Models¥1.83
Earnings-Based¥1.14
Dividend Discount¥1.41
Multiples¥1.94
Asset-Based¥3.38
Growth DCF¥1.92
Economic Profit¥2.42
Growth Earnings¥1.26

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

United Parcel Service

DCF Models$103
Earnings-Based$69.77
Multiples$141
Asset-Based$14.56
Growth DCF$89.84
Economic Profit$77.20
Growth Earnings$127

11 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Guangzhou Jiacheng
Bear ¥2.10Fair Value ¥3.24Bull ¥4.85
¥6.34 = current price (white tick)
United Parcel Service
Bear $58.10Fair Value $105Bull $165
$105 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Guangzhou Jiacheng · Industrials

Quality score50 · below median
Fair value upside-49% · below median

United Parcel Service · Industrials

Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+0% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees United Parcel Service as the more attractively valued of the two: Guangzhou Jiacheng trades at ¥6.34 versus a fair value of ¥3.24 (-49%), while United Parcel Service trades at $105 versus $105 (+0%).

United Parcel Service has the higher quality score (62/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.