EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Global New Material International Holdings vs Linde: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Global New Material International Holdings (6616) and Linde (LIN) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Global New Material International Holdings trades at HK$9.18 versus a fair value of HK$5.72 (-38%), while Linde trades at $470 versus $441 (-6%).
Global New Material International Holdings
6616.HK · HKD · Materials
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$9.18
Fair ValueHK$5.72
Quality16/100
Linde
LIN · USD · Materials
-6%
upside to fair value
fairly valued
Price$470
Fair Value$441
Quality70/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Global New Material International HoldingsLinde
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)30.8×
0.50×P/S (TTM)6.95×
0.46×P/B6.30× · book value is mostly goodwill
8.4×EV/EBITDA18.9×
n/aPEG2.18×
−37.7%Fair value upside−6.1%
n/aDividend yield1.3%
n/aDividend per share$6.10
Profitability
-8%Operating margin28%
0.13×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.84×
-7%Return on equity18%
1%Return on assets7%
Growth
129%Revenue growth (YoY)8%
47.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.6%
38.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.5%
n/aValue creation/yr+24.2%
Balance & size
0.4×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)42.1×
1.63×Debt / equity0.54×
$1BMarket cap$241B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Linde leads: 4 to 7 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Global New Material International Holdingsof which business quality 19 · market factors 73 Lindeof which business quality 66 · market factors 53
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
6
51
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
26
51
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
5
64
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
24
69
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
16
70
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
43
87
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
84
37
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
87
42
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
46
100

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyGlobal New Material International HoldingsPrice HK$9.18LindePrice $470
DCF Modelsn/a-54%below the price$216
Earnings-Basedn/a-72%below the price$132
Dividend Discountn/a-75%below the price$116
Multiples-94%below the priceHK$0.53-49%below the price$239
Asset-Based-82%below the priceHK$1.69-88%below the price$55.42
Growth DCFn/a-66%below the price$159
Economic Profitn/a-67%below the price$156
Growth Earningsn/a-57%below the price$204
Minimum-94%below the priceHK$0.53-88%below the price$55.42
Maximum-82%below the priceHK$1.69-49%below the price$239
Median-88%below the priceHK$1.11-66%below the price$158
Geometric mean-90%below the priceHK$0.95-69%below the price$147

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Global New Material International Holdings: 4 of 4 models see the stock below the current price.

Linde: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Global New Material International Holdings
Price HK$9.18
Fair Value HK$5.72
Bear HK$4.31Bull HK$8.63
Linde
Price $470
Fair Value $441
Bear $247Bull $737

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Global New Material International Holdings · Materials

Quality score16 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-38% · below median

Linde · Materials

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-6% · above median

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Linde as the less overvalued of the two: Global New Material International Holdings trades at HK$9.18 versus a fair value of HK$5.72 (-38%), while Linde trades at $470 versus $441 (-6%).

Linde has the higher quality score (70/100).

Open Linde live analysis →
Global New Material International Holdings · Linde

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Global New Material International Holdings

Microsoft vs NvidiaApple vs MicrosoftNvidia vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing

Related to Linde

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsCisco Systems vs NvidiaMicrosoft vs Taiwan Semiconductor ManufacturingApple vs Cisco Systems
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.