EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A vs Union Pacific: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A (688459) and Union Pacific (UNP) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A as the less overvalued of the two: China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A trades at ¥8.16 versus a fair value of ¥4.86 (-40%), while Union Pacific trades at $293 versus $145 (-51%).
China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A
688459.SHG · CNY · Industrials
-40%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥8.16
Fair Value¥4.86
Quality65/100
Union Pacific
UNP · USD · Industrials
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$293
Fair Value$145
Quality67/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. AUnion Pacific
Valuation
40.4×P/E (TTM)24.6×
3.46×P/S (TTM)7.25×
1.12×P/B9.70×
12.0×EV/EBITDA16.5×
PEG3.64×
1.9%Dividend yield1.8%
¥0.15Dividend per share$5.48
Profitability
9%Net margin29%
-16%Operating margin40%
3%Return on equity41%
1%Return on assets9%
Growth
-9%Revenue growth (YoY)3%
7.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-0.5%
7.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.6%
Balance & size
Debt / equity1.64×
$576MMarket cap$179B
healthyGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 6 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. Aof which business quality 66 · market factors 41 Union Pacificof which business quality 63 · market factors 72
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
26
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
41
57
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
74
71
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
100
40
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
80
47
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
94
74
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
23
66
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
13
81
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A

DCF Models¥9.72
Earnings-Based¥3.09
Dividend Discount¥2.06
Multiples¥6.58
Asset-Based¥4.83
Growth DCF¥9.86
Economic Profit¥6.13
Growth Earnings¥4.26

14 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Union Pacific

DCF Models$122
Earnings-Based$97.30
Multiples$180
Asset-Based$20.84
Growth DCF$69.97
Economic Profit$121
Growth Earnings$204

23 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A
Bear ¥3.65Fair Value ¥4.86Bull ¥6.08
¥8.16 = current price (white tick)
Union Pacific
Bear $89.73Fair Value $145Bull $266
$293 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A · Industrials

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-40% · below median

Union Pacific · Industrials

Quality score67 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-51% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A as the less overvalued of the two: China Railway Harbin Group of Technology Corp. A trades at ¥8.16 versus a fair value of ¥4.86 (-40%), while Union Pacific trades at $293 versus $145 (-51%).

Union Pacific has the higher quality score (67/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.