EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

TWL Holdings Bhd vs SAP: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how TWL Holdings Bhd (7079) and SAP (SAP) compare, as of Aug 10, 2026.

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees TWL Holdings Bhd as the more attractively valued of the two: TWL Holdings Bhd trades at MYR 0.02 versus a fair value of MYR 0.03 (+72%), while SAP trades at €179 versus €126 (-30%).
TWL Holdings Bhd
7079.KLSE · MYR · Real Estate
+72%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceMYR 0.02
Fair ValueMYR 0.03
Quality31/100
SAP
SAP.XETRA · EUR · Information Technology
-30%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price€179
Fair Value€126
Quality81/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

TWL Holdings BhdSAP
Valuation
2.5×P/E (TTM)22.1×
32.43×P/S (TTM)4.98×
0.08×P/B4.16×
EV/EBITDA15.7×
PEG1.37×
Dividend yield1.8%
Dividend per share€2.50
Profitability
0%Net margin20%
-32%Operating margin30%
-2%Return on equity16%
-1%Return on assets9%
Growth
-41%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
41.8%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)6.0%
38.2%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)6.1%
Balance & size
0.05×Debt / equity0.09×
$41MMarket cap$186B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

SAP leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

TWL Holdings Bhdof which business quality 37 · market factors 27 SAPof which business quality 78 · market factors 42
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
38
62
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
52
76
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
80
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
81
79
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
46
94
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
60
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
24
42
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
6
20
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
84

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

TWL Holdings Bhd

MultiplesMYR 0.10
Asset-BasedMYR 0.05
Economic ProfitMYR 0.06

0 of 7 models see the stock below the current price.

SAP

DCF Models€134
Earnings-Based€60.32
Dividend Discount€41.03
Multiples€116
Asset-Based€25.68
Growth DCF€116
Economic Profit€69.81
Growth Earnings€116

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

TWL Holdings Bhd
Bear MYR 0.03Fair Value MYR 0.03Bull MYR 0.04
MYR 0.02 = current price (white tick)
SAP
Bear €89.01Fair Value €126Bull €157
€179 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

TWL Holdings Bhd · Real Estate

Quality score31 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside+72% · Top 25%

SAP · Information Technology

Quality score81 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-30% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 10, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees TWL Holdings Bhd as the more attractively valued of the two: TWL Holdings Bhd trades at MYR 0.02 versus a fair value of MYR 0.03 (+72%), while SAP trades at €179 versus €126 (-30%).

SAP has the higher quality score (81/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.