Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Max Sight Group (8483) and Rollins (ROL) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.
As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Max Sight Group as the less overvalued of the two: Max Sight Group trades at HK$0.17 versus a fair value of HK$0.10 (-41%), while Rollins trades at $36.20 versus $21.11 (-42%).
Max Sight Group
8483.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
-41%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.17
Fair ValueHK$0.10
Quality60/100
Rollins
ROL · USD · Industrials
-42%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$36.20
Fair Value$21.11
Quality75/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
Max Sight GroupRollins
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)40.8×
0.28×P/S (TTM)5.57×
0.83×P/B15.58×
—EV/EBITDA25.3×
—PEG3.21×
5.0%Dividend yield1.6%
—Dividend per share$0.70
Profitability
-10%Net margin14%
-18%Operating margin16%
-20%Return on equity39%
-5%Return on assets15%
Growth
-42%Revenue growth (YoY)10%
12.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)11.7%
17.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)11.7%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.35×
$12MMarket cap$21B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Even match: 5 to 5 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
Max Sight Groupof which business quality 64 · market factors 59Rollinsof which business quality 73 · market factors 26
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
31
89
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
9
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
72
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
45
77
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
70
8
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
55
0
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
85
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
Max Sight Group
DCF ModelsHK$0.11
Dividend DiscountHK$0.07
MultiplesHK$0.10
Asset-BasedHK$0.01
Growth DCFHK$0.11
13 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.
Rollins
DCF Models$22.96
Earnings-Based$9.93
Multiples$18.94
Asset-Based$1.91
Growth DCF$19.98
Economic Profit$12.87
Growth Earnings$20.75
24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
Max Sight Group
Bear HK$0.07Fair Value HK$0.10Bull HK$0.12
HK$0.17 = current price (white tick)
Rollins
Bear $14.89Fair Value $21.11Bull $26.97
$36.20 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Free, no sign-up
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Max Sight Group · Consumer Discretionary
Quality score60 · above median
Fair value upside-41% · below median
Rollins · Industrials
Quality score75 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-42% · below median
Bottom line
As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Max Sight Group as the less overvalued of the two: Max Sight Group trades at HK$0.17 versus a fair value of HK$0.10 (-41%), while Rollins trades at $36.20 versus $21.11 (-42%).
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
