EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

I century Holding vs H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ): Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how I century Holding (8507) and H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) (HM-B) compare, as of Aug 25, 2026.

As of Aug 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: I century Holding trades at HK$0.62 versus a fair value of HK$0.26 (-57%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 185 versus SEK 165 (-10%).
I century Holding
8507.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
-57%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.62
Fair ValueHK$0.26
Quality44/100
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
HM-B.ST · SEK · Consumer Discretionary
-10%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceSEK 185
Fair ValueSEK 165
Quality72/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

I century HoldingH & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)21.3×
0.37×P/S (TTM)1.19×
3.89×P/B6.10×
22.4×EV/EBITDA10.8×
—PEG2.59×
—Dividend yield3.8%
—Dividend per shareSEK 7.10
Profitability
-0%Net margin6%
-8%Operating margin11%
-5%Return on equity35%
-1%Return on assets7%
Growth
-6%Revenue growth (YoY)-3%
2.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)0.7%
11.5%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.1%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.43×
$60MMarket cap$28B
mixedGrowth qualitymixed

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) leads: 4 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

I century Holdingof which business quality 48 · market factors 55 H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)of which business quality 69 · market factors 66
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
44
76
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
27
37
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
53
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
68
58
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
95
96
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
20
69
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
68
54
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
73
81
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
0
89

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

I century Holding

DCF ModelsHK$0.13
MultiplesHK$0.12
Asset-BasedHK$0.01
Growth DCFHK$0.15

11 of 11 models see the stock below the current price.

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

DCF ModelsSEK 255
Earnings-BasedSEK 84.94
MultiplesSEK 182
Asset-BasedSEK 20.51
Growth DCFSEK 244
Economic ProfitSEK 110
Growth EarningsSEK 162

11 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

I century Holding
Bear HK$0.20Fair Value HK$0.26Bull HK$0.33
HK$0.62 = current price (white tick)
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
Bear SEK 111Fair Value SEK 165Bull SEK 225
SEK 185 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

I century Holding · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score44 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-57% · bottom 25%

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-10% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: I century Holding trades at HK$0.62 versus a fair value of HK$0.26 (-57%), while H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) trades at SEK 185 versus SEK 165 (-10%).

H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) has the higher quality score (72/100).

See the full analysis →
I century Holding · H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to I century Holding

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupTesla vs PDD HoldingsTesla vs Sony Group

Related to H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)

Home Depot vs PDD HoldingsHome Depot vs Sony GroupAlphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.