EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Central China New Life Ltd vs Plaza S.A: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Central China New Life Ltd (9983) and Plaza S.A (MALLPLAZA) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Plaza S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Central China New Life Ltd trades at HK$0.36 versus a fair value of HK$0.22 (-38%), while Plaza S.A trades at CLP 3,970 versus CLP 4,571 (+15%).
Central China New Life Ltd
9983.HK · HKD · Real Estate
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.36
Fair ValueHK$0.22
Quality51/100
Plaza S.A
MALLPLAZA.SN · CLP · Real Estate
+15%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceCLP 3,970
Fair ValueCLP 4,571
Quality65/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Central China New Life LtdPlaza S.A
Valuation
2.5×P/E (TTM)6.0×
0.16×P/S (TTM)0.01×
0.23×P/B—
—EV/EBITDA2.3×
1.25×PEG—
8.7%Dividend yield1.8%
HK$0.03Dividend per shareCLP 68
Profitability
6%Net margin—
8%Operating margin78%
8%Return on equity37%
3%Return on assets5%
Growth
-9%Revenue growth (YoY)6%
-4.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)19.4%
0.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)28.4%
Balance & size
0.03×Debt / equity0.32×
$57MMarket cap$9B
weakGrowth qualitymixed

Plaza S.A leads: 3 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Central China New Life Ltdof which business quality 48 · market factors 18 Plaza S.Aof which business quality 64 · market factors 72
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
34
63
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
28
77
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
75
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
73
62
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
33
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
49
68
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
6
66
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
2
87
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
80
62

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Central China New Life Ltd

Dividend DiscountHK$1.23
MultiplesHK$2.70
Asset-BasedHK$0.98
Economic ProfitHK$1.25

0 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.

Plaza S.A

DCF ModelsCLP 5,184
Dividend DiscountCLP 946
MultiplesCLP 3,939
Asset-BasedCLP 1,371
Growth DCFCLP 5,933
Economic ProfitCLP 8,618

8 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Central China New Life Ltd
Bear HK$0.16Fair Value HK$0.22Bull HK$0.28
HK$0.36 = current price (white tick)
Plaza S.A
Bear CLP 2,761Fair Value CLP 4,571Bull CLP 10,216
CLP 3,970 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Central China New Life Ltd · Real Estate

Quality score51 · below median
Fair value upside-38% · below median

Plaza S.A · Real Estate

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+15% · above median

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Plaza S.A as the more attractively valued of the two: Central China New Life Ltd trades at HK$0.36 versus a fair value of HK$0.22 (-38%), while Plaza S.A trades at CLP 3,970 versus CLP 4,571 (+15%).

Plaza S.A has the higher quality score (65/100).

See the full analysis →
Central China New Life Ltd · Plaza S.A

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Central China New Life Ltd

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor Corporation

Related to Plaza S.A

Amazon.com vs PDD HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony GroupMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.