STOCK COMPARISON
ConocoPhillips vs Cnooc: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how ConocoPhillips (COP) and Cnooc (0883) compare, as of Aug 8, 2026.
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cnooc as the more attractively valued of the two: ConocoPhillips trades at $117 versus a fair value of $91.79 (-21%), while Cnooc trades at HK$22.70 versus HK$26.35 (+16%).
ConocoPhillips
COP · USD · Energy
-21%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$117
Fair Value$91.79
Quality61/100
Cnooc
0883.HK · HKD · Energy
+16%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceHK$22.70
Fair ValueHK$26.35
Quality62/100
Head-to-head numbers
Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).
ConocoPhillipsCnooc
Valuation
18.2×P/E (TTM)7.7×
2.22×P/S (TTM)2.67×
2.04×P/B1.35×
6.3×EV/EBITDA4.3×
0.94×PEG0.16×
2.9%Dividend yield5.0%
$3.24Dividend per shareHK$1.15
Profitability
12%Net margin31%
22%Operating margin45%
11%Return on equity15%
6%Return on assets9%
Growth
-5%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
-9.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-3.7%
25.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.0%
Balance & size
0.34×Debt / equity0.07×
$132BMarket cap$139B
healthyGrowth qualityexpensive
Cnooc leads: 2 to 12 metric wins.
Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
ConocoPhillipsof which business quality 61 · market factors 64
Cnoocof which business quality 64 · market factors 55
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
55
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
31
36
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
96
76
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
69
84
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
62
40
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
83
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
51
39
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
66
52
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
54
79
What the models say
The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.
ConocoPhillips
DCF Models$185
Earnings-Based$42.34
Dividend Discount$54.97
Multiples$121
Asset-Based$35.46
Growth DCF$177
Economic Profit$54.19
Growth Earnings$112
12 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Cnooc
DCF ModelsHK$49.31
Earnings-BasedHK$27.87
Dividend DiscountHK$25.25
MultiplesHK$49.40
Asset-BasedHK$12.08
Growth DCFHK$38.18
Economic ProfitHK$32.53
Growth EarningsHK$41.10
5 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.
ConocoPhillips
Bear $68.85Fair Value $91.79Bull $115
$117 = current price (white tick)
Cnooc
Bear HK$19.80Fair Value HK$26.35Bull HK$33.85
HK$22.70 = current price (white tick)
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
ConocoPhillips · Energy
Quality score61 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-21% · below median
Cnooc · Energy
Quality score62 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+16% · above median
Bottom line
As of Aug 8, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Cnooc as the more attractively valued of the two: ConocoPhillips trades at $117 versus a fair value of $91.79 (-21%), while Cnooc trades at HK$22.70 versus HK$26.35 (+16%).
Cnooc has the higher quality score (62/100).
See the full analysis →
More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Free · Top-25 report
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.
