EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

ConocoPhillips vs Williams Companies: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how ConocoPhillips (COP) and Williams Companies (WMB) compare, as of Aug 13, 2026.

As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ConocoPhillips as the less overvalued of the two: ConocoPhillips trades at $126 versus a fair value of $91.79 (-27%), while Williams Companies trades at $72.31 versus $12.03 (-83%).
ConocoPhillips
COP · USD · Energy
-27%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$126
Fair Value$91.79
Quality58/100
Williams Companies
WMB · USD · Energy
-83%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$72.31
Fair Value$12.03
Quality51/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

ConocoPhillipsWilliams Companies
Valuation
18.2×P/E (TTM)32.2×
2.22×P/S (TTM)7.41×
2.04×P/B7.01×
6.3×EV/EBITDA17.2×
0.94×PEG2.30×
2.9%Dividend yield2.7%
$3.24Dividend per share$2.03
Profitability
12%Net margin23%
22%Operating margin34%
11%Return on equity20%
6%Return on assets5%
Growth
-5%Revenue growth (YoY)9%
-9.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)2.9%
25.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)9.1%
Balance & size
0.34×Debt / equity2.13×
$132BMarket cap$90B
healthyGrowth qualityexpensive

ConocoPhillips leads: 9 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

ConocoPhillipsof which business quality 61 · market factors 73 Williams Companiesof which business quality 47 · market factors 68
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
45
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
31
43
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
96
61
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
69
11
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
62
50
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
83
88
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
62
56
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
80
68
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
54
83

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

ConocoPhillips

DCF Models$137
Earnings-Based$42.34
Dividend Discount$54.97
Multiples$86.74
Asset-Based$35.46
Growth DCF$153
Economic Profit$54.19
Growth Earnings$81.65

20 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Williams Companies

DCF Models$4.09
Earnings-Based$9.98
Multiples$13.70
Asset-Based$7.02
Economic Profit$14.21
Growth Earnings$25.93

15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

ConocoPhillips
Bear $68.85Fair Value $91.79Bull $115
$126 = current price (white tick)
Williams Companies
Bear $8.79Fair Value $12.03Bull $21.03
$72.31 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

ConocoPhillips · Energy

Quality score58 · above median
Fair value upside-27% · below median

Williams Companies · Energy

Quality score51 · above median
Fair value upside-83% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Aug 13, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ConocoPhillips as the less overvalued of the two: ConocoPhillips trades at $126 versus a fair value of $91.79 (-27%), while Williams Companies trades at $72.31 versus $12.03 (-83%).

ConocoPhillips has the higher quality score (58/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.