Creepy Jar vs Konami Holdings: Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Creepy Jar (CRJ) and Konami Holdings (KNM) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.
betterweakerfor reference, not scored
Konami Holdings leads: 3 to 6 metric wins.
n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | Creepy JarPrice PLN 460 | Konami HoldingsPrice £215 |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Models | ▼-49%below the pricePLN 234 | ▲+6569%above the price£14,315 |
| Earnings-Based | ▲+87%above the pricePLN 861 | ▲+3348%above the price£7,401 |
| Dividend Discount | ▼-72%below the pricePLN 129 | ▲+1439%above the price£3,304 |
| Multiples | ▼-22%below the pricePLN 357 | ▲+6720%above the price£14,639 |
| Asset-Based | ▼-75%below the pricePLN 114 | ▲+1200%above the price£2,790 |
| Growth DCF | ▼-74%below the pricePLN 121 | ▲+5922%above the price£12,926 |
| Economic Profit | ▼-57%below the pricePLN 196 | ▲+4239%above the price£9,313 |
| Growth Earnings | ▲+148%above the pricePLN 1,142 | ▲+6255%above the price£13,641 |
| Minimum | ▼-75%below the pricePLN 114 | ▲+1200%above the price£2,790 |
| Maximum | ▲+148%above the pricePLN 1,142 | ▲+6720%above the price£14,639 |
| Median | ▼-53%below the pricePLN 215 | ▲+5080%above the price£11,120 |
| Geometric mean | ▼-41%below the pricePLN 270 | ▲+3787%above the price£8,343 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
Creepy Jar: 19 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Konami Holdings: 0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Creepy Jar · Communication Services
Konami Holdings · Communication Services
Bottom line
As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Creepy Jar as the less overvalued of the two: Creepy Jar trades at PLN 460 versus a fair value of PLN 306 (-34%), while Konami Holdings trades at £215 versus £65.48 (-69%).
Konami Holdings has the higher quality score (74/100).
Open Creepy Jar live analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
See the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.