EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Equites Property Fund vs Quanta Services: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Equites Property Fund (EQU) and Quanta Services (PWR) compare, as of Sep 11, 2026.

As of Sep 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Equites Property Fund as the more attractively valued of the two: Equites Property Fund trades at ZAR 17.66 versus a fair value of ZAR 23.67 (+34%), while Quanta Services trades at $619 versus $144 (-77%).
Equites Property Fund
EQU.JSE · ZAC · Real Estate
+34%
upside to fair value
undervalued
PriceZAR 17.66
Fair ValueZAR 23.67
Quality61/100
Quanta Services
PWR · USD · Industrials
-77%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$619
Fair Value$144
Quality50/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Equites Property FundQuanta Services
Valuation
10.1×P/E (TTM)91.8×
4.92×P/S (TTM)3.33×
1.07×P/B11.22×
12.8×EV/EBITDA39.5×
—PEG1.84×
+34.0%Fair value upside−76.7%
7.9%Dividend yield0.1%
ZAR 1.41Dividend per share$0.42
Profitability
57%Operating margin4%
0.67×EBIT margin trend (5Y)1.02×
11%Return on equity14%
3%Return on assets5%
Growth
-29%Revenue growth (YoY)26%
-0.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)18.4%
21.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)20.4%
+11.8%Value creation/yr+16.8%
Balance & size
2.3×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)6.3×
0.42×Debt / equity0.59×
$972MMarket cap$100B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

Quanta Services leads: 5 to 6 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Equites Property Fundof which business quality 57 · market factors 61 Quanta Servicesof which business quality 52 · market factors 61
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
40
45
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
60
44
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
78
59
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
37
55
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
88
36
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
96
41
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
45
64
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
49
80
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
53
72

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyEquites Property FundPrice ZAR 17.66Quanta ServicesPrice $619
DCF Models+101%above the priceZAR 35.44-66%below the price$212
Earnings-Basedn/a-82%below the price$111
Dividend Discount+65%above the priceZAR 29.23-99%below the price$7.09
Multiples+37%above the priceZAR 24.27-79%below the price$130
Asset-Based-37%below the priceZAR 11.17-94%below the price$39.91
Growth DCF+72%above the priceZAR 30.38-63%below the price$227
Economic Profit-2%close to the priceZAR 17.33-90%below the price$64.82
Growth Earningsn/a-74%below the price$163
Minimum-37%below the priceZAR 11.17-99%below the price$7.09
Maximum+101%above the priceZAR 35.44-63%below the price$227
Median+51%above the priceZAR 26.75-80%below the price$121
Geometric mean+30%above the priceZAR 22.99-87%below the price$82.21

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Equites Property Fund: 3 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Quanta Services: 26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Equites Property Fund
Bear ZAR 14.24Fair Value ZAR 23.67Bull ZAR 29.59
ZAR 17.66 = current price (white tick)
Quanta Services
Bear $107Fair Value $144Bull $180
$619 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Equites Property Fund · Real Estate

Quality score61 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+34% · above median

Quanta Services · Industrials

Quality score50 · below median
Fair value upside-77% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 11, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Equites Property Fund as the more attractively valued of the two: Equites Property Fund trades at ZAR 17.66 versus a fair value of ZAR 23.67 (+34%), while Quanta Services trades at $619 versus $144 (-77%).

Equites Property Fund has the higher quality score (61/100).

See the full analysis →
Equites Property Fund · Quanta Services

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Equites Property Fund

Alphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseAmazon.com vs Alibaba Group Holding

Related to Quanta Services

Amazon.com vs Sony GroupAmazon.com vs PDD HoldingsMeta Platforms vs Verizon CommunicationsMeta Platforms vs At&t
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.